36 Comments
User's avatar
Bryan's avatar

You can tell all you needed to know about the 'vaccine' from Pfizer's own study. Forget the much ballyhooed 95% effectiveness. What really mattered was the .84% ARR (which the like's of Dana never mentioned). Any drug that has such a minimal risk reduction, and for which there is zero long term health data, you'd be stupid to voluntarily take it.

Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

And there is evidence that the jab makes people even stupider...

Bryan's avatar

LOL ! I don't doubt that !

Alison's avatar

And nastier.

peter blatch's avatar

The two biggest areas of growth for big pHarma, are for cancer treatments and neurological issues. Not long ago, Pfizzer spent $43B on cancer treatment enterprises, no doubt in anticipation of increased profits from the cancers they knew their deadly products would cause.

Mary's avatar

Never get tested for a "Virus" or "Cancer" all tests create patients out of healthy people. Www.VirusTruth.NET

Maybe's avatar

Where is that evidence?

User was indefinitely suspended for this comment. Show
Rachel Girshick's avatar

For a "deepr dive" into why to NOT trust, current, big harma's cancer, etc. tests, watch Naomi Wolf's prestention of her analysis of "The Pfizer Documents", to the European Parliament on 9/3/2025.

I just found this few days ago, demonstrating, Pfizer's data trajectory, tells the rest of the story, how to get rid of "useless eaters".

Just when I thought it couldn't get more "conspiratorial", it can, "they" never cease to amaze.

So, you can take all their tests & their remedies you believe in, enjoy, & live a long prosperous life!

& while you are deep diving for another issue of amusement, check out : "Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of free-directed Energy on 9/11" by author Dr. Judy Wood, (B.S. in Civil M.S. in Engineering, Ph.D. Materials Engineering).( she also has videos, unless they've been removed)

W/all the flanks we are being attacked on, we are in deep doodoo! Oh, & then there is:

The Dimming" by Dane Wiggington, geoengineering watch.org. For when you are bored & need entertainment.

Baldmichael's avatar

Just look in the mirror Maybe and you will see. :<)

Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

May be why they refuse to 'see' it. They know what damage they have done to themselves, and their loved ones, and they have themselves to blame.

Baldmichael's avatar

I wouldn't take it with long term health data given I don't believe in poisoning myself for long term health.

Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

Right, silly to take it without long-term data, and the longest-term data we do have is very concerning.

Keith.'s avatar

She tried to dominate knowing RFk's voice did not have the same volume or clarity. A courteous host would have allowed for that.

Baldmichael's avatar

Dana Ruth Bash, her full name, anagrams to:

- a harsh bad nut

- brash data Hun

And anyway, with a surname like Bash she was hardly likely to be kind.

Michelle Rigby's avatar

You declined the jab - well done you. I had 5 from age 74, before I wised up (I’m still here, just). I now have zero faith in the UK or suS gov, or the NHS. Charles Richet was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1913 for his discovery of anaphylaxis, and he stated clearly (and correctly);: “injections sensitise, exposure amplifies” and “anaphylaxis is an INEVITABLE consequence of injections” i.e. it is never going to be possible to make vaccination safe. The anaphylaxis problem is absolutely fundamental, and there is no way around it. All vaccines are toxic poisons - no exceptions are possible.

Baldmichael's avatar

5 and you survived by the grace of God! I went through the NHS from 2018 to 2021. Some bits are good like the curate's egg but overall it is useless and should be slaughtered despite being a sacred cow.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/nhs-advice-why-vaccination-is-important?utm_source=publication-search

Areugnat's avatar

Dana Bash is a self righteous know-nothing, who is under the impression that she is informed. Painful to watch.

Mary's avatar

Anyone on TV is a gatekeeper, including Rfk jr. All vaccines can only produce harm unless some are filled with saline. Rfk jr and trump know viruses are dead cell debris, NOT con tagious particles! Www.VirusTruth.NET

All vaccines need to stop yesterday!

ME's avatar

I love that man, and hope he stays in this otherwise-horrific administration where he can make a difference like no other.

Rachel Girshick's avatar

I watched part of the interview, & was impressed, once again @ the utter rudeness, change in subject matter & inability to produce backup documentation of "claims" of any studies done, by Dana, as were RFK Jr's "interrogationists during his Senate hearings, etc. I admire RFK jr.'s ability to continue to engage w/big Harma schills.

All that being said, as Sect. of HHS, RFK jr. has the power to end the PREP act, & must do so @ once, this is long overdue. Thiis the only quick move that can stop the toxic, mRNA, gene therapy program that has been ramped up to put in everything possible, by our elite, genocidal, "One World" overlords.

Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

Very weird, huh? Shits on the COVID jabs, even now. So, ummm, why are they still approved? He clearly is very limited in what he can do. Maybe Trump's ego, who knows?

User was indefinitely suspended for this comment. Show
Mary Makary's avatar

Don't feed these things.

Matt Hoole's avatar

You keep plugging’ on Raphael. The day will be upon us soon where you might even get an apology from all those misguided ….

Steve Kirsch's avatar

CNN wrote an article about this interview and they were unable to cite the study that RFK ask for instead they cited a study based on modeling showing that there might have been a benefit for very old people. So CNN basically couldn’t come up with the study, but refused to admit they couldn’t come up with the study.

H8SBAD's avatar

A Confederacy of Dunces

Aquila's avatar

She's a cougar. Who needs "The Science" when you have a stylist budget that big?

Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

I don't know about that one, aren't cougars meant to be attractive?