The claim that Fauci knew COVID-19 vaccines were causing miscarriages is sweeping the inter websright now, but to this logician it seems like everyone’s getting a bit too excited. Let me start by trying to stave off a bunch of hate mail, which will inevitably come anyway. I have no love for Fauci. My research and legal actions make it very clear which ‘side’ I am on, and my X profile clearly states that my pronouns are, like Elon Musk’s, prosecute/Pfauci. And while I don’t have definitive proof, I do suspect that the jabs are impacting fertility. But… The claim currently going crazy on social media right now is not quite right.
I’ll refrain from naming names as these are all people I respect and fight alongside on all things COVID, except for one, the originator of the claim. Senator Ron Johnson, a great guy, one of the few ‘good guy’ politicians, who helped bring me to the US to testify and who placed my critique of Watson et al (tens of millions saved by the jabs in 1 year…) into the official record of the US Senate, shared the above image on X. Fauci at one point wondered if the jabs could theoretically cause miscarriage, and then later indicated they didn’t find any evidence of such. That’s a nothignburger. Those things are totally compatible with each other.
It’s what scientists should do. Consider a bunch of hypotheses, gather evidence, and then come to conclusions. Figure out which hypotheses are plausible and which aren’t. Logically speaking, and logic is my forte, having taught on it at university for many years, there is no story here. It would be like if I at one point said that while I don’t believe in God, I haven’t checked every inch of the Universe, and it’s possible he might be out there somewhere. And then later I say that I have looked quite a bit and find no evidence of God’s existence. And then hordes of people rise up as one excitedly proclaiming what a liar and hypocrite I am. There’s no story there.
Here’s what the story could be. The jabs do cause miscarriage. Fauci knew about it, before he made these statements. That’s a story! And that explains why he likes pleading the fifth. See if you can make that one happen. But as we have it, there’s no story, just embarrassment. It makes us all look bad, fueling the suspicions of the ‘other side’, that we are illogical and scientifically illiterate.
Okay then.
TL;DR: COVID jabs may well be causing miscarriage. And that bastard Saint Pfauci may well have known about it. But him initially saying that it may be possible and later saying that he sees no evidence of it is a complete nothingburger.
The injections were designed intentionally by someone with my sort of training and experience to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.
Please note, there was no pandemic, no new illness and no virus. The entire event, like the 20 years of desktop simulations before 2020, was wholly a simulation.
To a practical point, it’s formally impossible to invent, test, develop, clinically evaluate, manufacture, gain any kind of regulatory authorisation and launch in less than several years.
It doesn’t matter how much resource is thrown at this non existent problem, a new, complex biological product cannot emerge in under a year. Even investing massively in parallel, the so-called “investment at risk” strategy, cannot succeed. You need the results of step A in order to inform the specifics of step B.
I now know that pandemics are all fake and have never occurred. The authorities certainly know this, too. Armed with this knowledge, it’s irredeemably illogical to launch “a hunt for vaccines” in order to combat an alleged pandemic, because the work unavoidably involved takes far longer to conduct than the duration of the longest ever “pandemic”.
Then we have the basic design of these injections. Whether they operate as described is irrelevant to intent. The authorities told us that these gene-based products would cause our bodies to manufacture whatever was encoded in the mRNA/DNA sequences.
Yet every medical doctor knows that the way our bodies distinguish between self and non self is absolutely crucial to health. Causing our bodies to synthesise these foreign, non self proteins MUST inevitably prompt destructive host responses.
I believe that these responses, prompted in a wide variety of tissues and organs, are pivotally responsible for much of the clinical toxicity undoubtedly observed. Other components such as lipid nanoparticles are also ingredients known unequivocally to produce toxicity.
There is simply no scenario in which one can objectively conclude that the false narrative, the fear provoking media barrage and the knowingly toxic injections, which could never, even theoretically, have been of any benefit to anyone, nor deliverable in less than several years, had a benign motivation. On the contrary, the whole event was a stage set in which the aim of the perpetrators was, among other things, to poison billions of people, and has done so, to varying extents.
Please note that toxicity is always a question of dose and dose frequency. I do not believe they intended to kill everyone who allowed themselves to be injected. I do think the chaos the perpetrators imposed upon us was used “to calibrate the weapons”. Recall that some batches were very much more toxic than others? This degree of variation in clinical profile is impossible to have occurred by chance. I conclude that this aspect too was cold heartedly thought through and the perpetrators now how the empirical, large scale data they need in order to utilise the designed-in toxicity of these injections, which I anticipate will be used, repeatedly, on the people, if they succeed in installing the totalitarian, digital control system.
These conclusions I reached using my original training in mechanistic toxicology, my research based training in respiratory pharmacology and my 30+ years in big pharma and biotech.
It's quite likely the jabs are no good if you're pregnant, despite the TGA/ATAGI et al telling pregnant women they should get jabbed. This is despite Pfizer never having done tests. It's also not in the medical establishment's interest to track if miscarriages have actually been correlated with increased jabbing. Of course, correlation != causation, except when it does !