Jabbed overrepresented in COVID deaths, all-cause deaths, and media blatantly lies about it
Excess non-COVID deaths have been noticed all over the world, with mainstream news outlet the BBC noting that the UK is experiencing “one of the largest excess death levels outside the pandemic in 50 years”. While the usual efforts are made to find the culprit in long COVID, poor healthcare, and even the lockdowns (no mention of climate change this time), the BBC is predictably sure it isn’t the ‘safe and effective’ jabs, despite acknowledging that cardiovascular deaths are a big part of the excess and that the jabs do cause cardiovascular problems. Source.
What strikes us, however, is the BBC’s outstanding assertion that “figures up to June 2022 looking at deaths from all causes show unvaccinated people were more likely to die than vaccinated people… if vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around.” Such a bold and important claim would be expected by astute readers to be supported with mounds of evidence. The BBC provides a single link to UK government data, containing tonnes of information, without any analysis, explanation, or commentary. Luckily, you have us, and we at OTN know how to read and can perform basic arithmetic. Focussing on the most complete data set, and then further on Table 8, the most helpful and juiciest table of them all, we see that the BBC is utilising data from January 2021 to May 2022, from ages 10 and up (source). First problem. Hardly anyone was jabbed in early 2021 as the jabs had just become available. It shouldn’t be much of a shock then that for January 2021 we see 61,369 (all-cause) deaths in the “Unvaccinated” (henceforth ‘unjabbed’) and only 11,808 (all-cause) deaths in the “Ever vaccinated” (henceforth ‘jabbed’). Maybe that’s how the vaccines were claimed to be effective in the first place (the first year of the pandemic saw the most lethal strain, and we had no jab), but we digress. The situation looks a little different when looking at the last month of the data set, May 2022, a time when we can more safely assume that we know roughly how many people are jabbed, being most people, and the unjabbed are probably not going to change their minds; and we’ve had time to allow for some jabby side effects to appear. There were only 1,517 all-cause deaths in the unjabbed. There were 33,597 all-cause deaths in the jabbed. The jabbed made up around 95.7% of the all-cause deaths. For proper context, what proportion of the British public were jabbed then? Utilising UK government data (source), we estimate this to be around 90%. Given the slightly different age ranges in the data sets and the time difference, maybe we should consider it to be less than 90%, but we’ll be kind. And just to help the BBC out further, we want to be clear that 95.7 is a bigger number than 90. And 4.3% (unjabbed death proportion) is much smaller than 10% (unjabbed proportion). So recalling the BBC’s comment, “if vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around”, it appears that the data does indeed allow us to flip the earlier comment around to: “looking at deaths from all causes show vaccinated people were more likely to die than unvaccinated people”. The unjabbed, despite severe persecution, appear to be doing very well for themselves, at least in terms of deaths. Someone’s lying, and I don’t think it’s us; we can read and add, and have no qualms about properly referencing evidence.
Okay then.
Interestingly, the data set also looks at deaths “involving COVID-19”. For May 2022 there were only 120 COVID deaths in the unjabbed. There were 1,439 COVID deaths in the jabbed. Unjabbed share of COVID deaths is around 7.7%. Once again, this is smaller than 10%. Looks like the jabbed, already worse off for all cause deaths, are even worse off when it comes to COVID deaths. You read that right. The jabs are meant to save people from COVID, but it looks like they make COVID deaths more likely. The dreaded negative effectiveness we have covered so much, with increasing evidence that it not only applies to infections and hospitalisations, but also to deaths.
Okay then.
Extra: But wait, there’s more. Second problem. This already damning data ends in May 2022, and it was (poorly) utilised in a BBC article asserting that “It wasn’t until June [2022] that excess deaths really started to rise”. How is this journalism? Why did the BBC not provide relevant data? Why does the government data stop there, I wonder? Now that the pandemic is pretty much over and the jabbed/unjabbed proportion should be relatively static, is it time to really start comparing all-cause mortality among the jabbed and unjabbed all around the world to once and for all settle the debate around ‘safe and effective’? Third problem. The BBC’s outstanding claim relied on one (flawed) data set, without any context or analysis. Why wouldn’t they look at all the available evidence, including the increasing evidence of negative effectiveness and the increasing evidence that the jabs can cause cardiovascular and other deaths? Fourth problem. Their brushing off of jab cardiovascular effects as being “mainly seen in boys and young men, while the excess deaths are highest in older men - aged 50 or more” would seem totally off to many of our readers who observe that COVID mainly killed off the elderly while vaccine side effects apply to all age groups, and lacks any explanation or reference. Why don’t they appeal to the available data and analyses? Finally, lawsuits, anyone?