Still more evidence of COVID-19 vaccines' negative effectiveness
It really does seem that evidence against the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines is starting to pile up; we typically had a new damning article from a proper medical journal every 1-2 weeks, but now, just days after our last entry on the apparent negative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines (the notion that the vaccine actually increases your chance of getting COVID-19, and even can increase your chance of dying from it), we have more evidence.
A study on the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, funded by Moderna, and involving Moderna employees, reveals negative effectiveness regarding infection for a 3-dose Moderna vaccine schedule on most Omicron variants, within a few months, as seen in Figure 2 (source):
And another study, this time out of Sweden [since published, Yiyi Xu et al.], reveals dramatic negative effectiveness regarding infection, around -100% (so doubling your chances of getting COVID-19), within months, but also negative effectiveness regarding hospitalisation and death, as seen in Figures 3 and 2 (source):
Okay then.
Note: Some questions you may like to ask. Why would these vaccines even be made available, let alone be mandated, if they increase our chances of getting COVID-19, dying from COVID-19, or suffering from other adverse effects? Why would we take ongoing booster shots when this is the result of the first 2-3 doses? Why is natural immunity continuously downplayed, especially when there is no evidence that it becomes negatively effective? When do the lawsuits start?