Suddenly science reveals the jabs aren't safe for young adults?
As noted in our most recent entry, despite the increasing evidence of the COVID-19 vaccines’ negative effectiveness (increasing one’s chance of getting COVID-19, getting severe COVID-19, and even dying from COVID-19), and the negative effectiveness being obvious from Pfizer’s own data last year, our leaders and the experts, aided by mainstream news outlets, still instruct all of us to get vaccinated and boosted.
A study has just been published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, one of the top medical ethics journals in the world, and involving experts from top institutions such as Oxford, Harvard, and Johns Hopkins, whose abstract states: “In 2022, students at North American universities with third-dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates risk disenrolment if unvaccinated. To assess the appropriateness of booster mandates in this age group, we combine empirical risk-benefit assessment and ethical analysis. To prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation over a 6-month period, we estimate that 31 207–42 836 young adults aged 18–29 years must receive a third mRNA vaccine. Booster mandates in young adults are expected to cause a net harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented, we anticipate at least 18.5 serious adverse events from mRNA vaccines, including 1.5–4.6 booster-associated myopericarditis cases in males (typically requiring hospitalisation). We also anticipate 1430–4626 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity interfering with daily activities (although typically not requiring hospitalisation). University booster mandates are unethical because they: (1) are not based on an updated (Omicron era) stratified risk-benefit assessment for this age group; (2) may result in a net harm to healthy young adults; (3) are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; (4) violate the reciprocity principle because serious vaccine-related harms are not reliably compensated due to gaps in vaccine injury schemes; and (5) may result in wider social harms.” Source.
Okay then.
Note: Some questions you may wish to ask. Should we just hope that not too many young people took the jab? Wouldn’t the situation become more dire as the ‘unknown unknowns’ are revealed over time? Wouldn’t the vaccine fail the risk-benefit analysis to an even greater extent when negative effectiveness is factored in? On negative effectiveness, should COVID-19 deaths caused by the vaccine be marked down as vaccine deaths, and not used as further reasons to take the vaccine? If it isn’t worth young adults taking the jabs (with some experts recommending that no-one under the age of 50 should take them), shouldn’t children, particularly infants, also avoid the jab? Why are countries all over the world approving the jabs for children as young as 6 months, as well as for pregnant females? With it apparently being no longer appropriate for so many people to take the jab, according to the actual science, and with the virus constantly evolving into more benign forms, can we really be sure it’s a good idea for the elderly to take it? Should we maybe just stop giving the jab to everybody until we can find out how effective they really are, how safe they really are, and what the hell is causing the mysterious rise in non-COVID deaths all over the world?