One of the most alarming issues around the COVID-19 vaccines has been perceived negative efficacy/effectiveness, because it means that the jab *increases* the risk of COVID infection, hospitalisation, and even death.
Thank you so much for keeping at it in these catastrophically ironic times. I would love to know the actual statistics on what percentage of the injected have woken up to the fact that they were screwed over, lied to,
and murdered or had their lives shortened considerably? I don't know any of these people or if I do they're not talking even though they should be screaming it from the rooftops and bringing massive class action lawsuits. Okay then ...
Thank you for another great piece! This is what real journalism is! Those of us who aren't sheep, truly appreciate your hard work! Fuck the CDC & the WHO! Have always had pretty much zero faith in them. 👏💪🇱🇷
Interesting article by researchers Nakatari et al, Raphael ,but what grabs my attention the most is that it's about an illness called Covid based only upon a positive or negative PCR test. I have more than reasonable doubts as to the validity of this test.
I say this because:
1. This PCR test was withdrawn by the American CDC in 2021 and replaced with a test that tests for both Covid and Influenza ---- because the original test could not tell the difference. Does this make all previous positive tests invalid ( ie potentially false) and so, is this proof there was no proven epidemic ? I suspect so. Is this issue discussed in the media or well known? No. Why? Ask them. This is however , discussed in non mainstream media, and suppressed ( ie censored).
2.There is no laboratory in the world that has isolated this "novel corona virus." ( Christine Massey- https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/fda-fails-another-virus-foia-challenge) . Look it up. Instead the virology explanation is that because they can see unidentified particles with the electron microscope which when added to a particular cell culture cause "damage" to those cells ....it must be the virus causing it. ( they say) ..what leap of faith !!!!.... This is not science. Unbelievable actually. This is nonsense; this is what they call isolation. Also, there are other possible explanations for these particles. See what I mean. It lacks scientific credibility and to be the virologist's definition of what is called isolation seriously reflects on these virologists' professional conduct .
3. In fact the producer of this coronavirus PCR test, Drosten et al, (from the Charite Hospital Berlin) was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2020. Drosten even used a 2003 Coronavirus genome ( ie DNA) to base his newly developed 2019 PCR test because " they looked similar". What ???? What ???
It appears, I suspect , that continuing research in this area is intended to take our attention away from the facts by not looking at the chronological history of the matter. I use the word 'facts' and I won't use the word 'truth' because it is far too emotive and subjective.
Only through respected and investigative journalism to clear the fog will help us all understand what this Covid narrative truly was. A scam.
Apologies if this is old news here, but any so-called "vaccine" (even a harmful one) can be statistically given a high efficacy by counting recent recipients as unvaccinated (or simply not counting them at all) for one, two or three weeks...
Many thanks for that link - an excellent summary or your (and others) very impressive efforts to determine the truth and speak out about it.
Had you not done so, and continue to do so, humankind would have already suffered this abomination: "time to consider mandatory vaccines" (U von der Leyen, December 2021).
After a certain point in time, I do not know when, as so many here in Japan have gotten the clot shot, statistically all who are getting covid in Japan have been vaxxinated against it.
As an aside, whether it is covid, the flu or the heebie jeebies, absent is the amount students of secondary education including med schools and nursing school that have been shot up since reopening the schools here.
The vaccines cannot be effective, but the main reason is that Covid-19 has been only a mortality-fallacy, not more dangerous than a weak flu. If you calculate the average number of conditions in a comparative group of alive ones, with the same age-structure like of "official Covid-19 victims" then this age-adjustment eliminates any meaning of age of the virus' victims. It is then similar to the situation all have only the same age (e.g. 75) and the only difference amongst them is a number of conditions. The not increased number against the comparative group means those people were in a dying state first and only then got infected or were positively tested, but Covid-19 was none reason of their death: https://zenodo.org/record/8312871
The second method (in Shortened Supplement) is shorter and easier. Some journals fully listed in PubMed (mainly from the U.S.) ask for the methods themselves, but they are not scheduled to be given to any journal.
Thank you so much for keeping at it in these catastrophically ironic times. I would love to know the actual statistics on what percentage of the injected have woken up to the fact that they were screwed over, lied to,
and murdered or had their lives shortened considerably? I don't know any of these people or if I do they're not talking even though they should be screaming it from the rooftops and bringing massive class action lawsuits. Okay then ...
I don't know any of these people. Everyone I know who is jabbed still defends the jabs.
Thank you for another great piece! This is what real journalism is! Those of us who aren't sheep, truly appreciate your hard work! Fuck the CDC & the WHO! Have always had pretty much zero faith in them. 👏💪🇱🇷
Interesting article by researchers Nakatari et al, Raphael ,but what grabs my attention the most is that it's about an illness called Covid based only upon a positive or negative PCR test. I have more than reasonable doubts as to the validity of this test.
I say this because:
1. This PCR test was withdrawn by the American CDC in 2021 and replaced with a test that tests for both Covid and Influenza ---- because the original test could not tell the difference. Does this make all previous positive tests invalid ( ie potentially false) and so, is this proof there was no proven epidemic ? I suspect so. Is this issue discussed in the media or well known? No. Why? Ask them. This is however , discussed in non mainstream media, and suppressed ( ie censored).
2.There is no laboratory in the world that has isolated this "novel corona virus." ( Christine Massey- https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/fda-fails-another-virus-foia-challenge) . Look it up. Instead the virology explanation is that because they can see unidentified particles with the electron microscope which when added to a particular cell culture cause "damage" to those cells ....it must be the virus causing it. ( they say) ..what leap of faith !!!!.... This is not science. Unbelievable actually. This is nonsense; this is what they call isolation. Also, there are other possible explanations for these particles. See what I mean. It lacks scientific credibility and to be the virologist's definition of what is called isolation seriously reflects on these virologists' professional conduct .
3. In fact the producer of this coronavirus PCR test, Drosten et al, (from the Charite Hospital Berlin) was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2020. Drosten even used a 2003 Coronavirus genome ( ie DNA) to base his newly developed 2019 PCR test because " they looked similar". What ???? What ???
It appears, I suspect , that continuing research in this area is intended to take our attention away from the facts by not looking at the chronological history of the matter. I use the word 'facts' and I won't use the word 'truth' because it is far too emotive and subjective.
Only through respected and investigative journalism to clear the fog will help us all understand what this Covid narrative truly was. A scam.
Apologies if this is old news here, but any so-called "vaccine" (even a harmful one) can be statistically given a high efficacy by counting recent recipients as unvaccinated (or simply not counting them at all) for one, two or three weeks...
https://rumble.com/v3f6f0h-vaccine-efficacy-cheap-trick-by-exclusion.html
Yes, very familiar with it, published on it in medical journals: https://okaythennews.substack.com/p/science-summary-covid-19-vaccines
Many thanks for that link - an excellent summary or your (and others) very impressive efforts to determine the truth and speak out about it.
Had you not done so, and continue to do so, humankind would have already suffered this abomination: "time to consider mandatory vaccines" (U von der Leyen, December 2021).
You have nature itself on your side.
I love your stuff. Thanks for persevering. 🙏💪
After a certain point in time, I do not know when, as so many here in Japan have gotten the clot shot, statistically all who are getting covid in Japan have been vaxxinated against it.
As an aside, whether it is covid, the flu or the heebie jeebies, absent is the amount students of secondary education including med schools and nursing school that have been shot up since reopening the schools here.
The vaccines cannot be effective, but the main reason is that Covid-19 has been only a mortality-fallacy, not more dangerous than a weak flu. If you calculate the average number of conditions in a comparative group of alive ones, with the same age-structure like of "official Covid-19 victims" then this age-adjustment eliminates any meaning of age of the virus' victims. It is then similar to the situation all have only the same age (e.g. 75) and the only difference amongst them is a number of conditions. The not increased number against the comparative group means those people were in a dying state first and only then got infected or were positively tested, but Covid-19 was none reason of their death: https://zenodo.org/record/8312871
The second method (in Shortened Supplement) is shorter and easier. Some journals fully listed in PubMed (mainly from the U.S.) ask for the methods themselves, but they are not scheduled to be given to any journal.
This seems simply corroborate the Cleveland Clinic study Source https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/10/6/ofad209/7131292. In fact the graph you show is from the Cleveland Clinic study but not explicitly annotated.
Yes, I whip out this wonderful image every time we have some evidence for dose-dependant negative effectiveness.
.
My favorite parts of Covid:
#42
All I see are people that gave up on themselves and forfeited their minds.
.