COVID jab negative effectiveness increasingly obvious
We’ve covered the apparent negative effectiveness of the COVID-19 jabs (the notion that the jabs *increase* your chance of COVID infection/hospitalisation/death) quite a bit, with a certain pre-print study (Shrestha et al.) being particularly compelling due to its identification of a dose-dependant relationship (the more jabs, the more COVID). That article has now been accepted, by Oxford University Press. Source.
As more time has elapsed, the study has been improved, with more references and data bolstering the earlier version’s implications that, yes, the bivalent boosters are effectively useless, and the more jabs you have the more likely you’ll be infected - and there is some valuable discussion on why this might be happening. This graph (from their Figure 2) is worth a thousand words:
Okay then.
Extra: So if COVID never really was that bad, especially in the young and healthy, and it has become more benign over time; and the jab appears to be killing a bunch of people; and when it comes to COVID its effectiveness (re infection, hospitalisation, and even death) rapidly wanes to 0 and even less than 0; why are we still encouraging and even forcing the jabs again?*
*Extra: At OTN we slowly but surely build with ongoing evidence over time. To get up to speed on all this, and more, see our two science summaries, and our latest entry on the mysterious rise in non-COVID excess deaths that just so happens to coincide with the introduction of the jabs.
Do you have a comment on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6Om398G_zs about the 3:00 mark. Seems to making stuff up IMO ?
That graph is quite clear!!!!!!!!! I am C19 unvaccinated and my mate is 5x's C19 vaxxed...Moderna being the favored shot...topping off with the bivalent Pfizer for #5. Over the prior 2.5 years, he had caused the destruction of my career and gratuitously (and happily) shared a lot CNN-inspired vicious scorn, over my quiet, but determined and informed, non-jab status. Among the many things, I was accused of endangering his life. So, we'd been in this high-C19+C19Vaxx-tension stalemate for 2+ years, neither of us getting C19 until he did, March 2023. And promptly passed it to me. Irony galore, right?! He got a 103 fever, called the Doc and got the molnupiravir. I had a 101 fever and took ivermectin ("horse paste" were his words a year before) from my stash. I recovered fully and quickly, and so did he. I share all this (and probably have previously oops) because I really wonder now about the implications of what this graph tells us... I wonder if my mate will get the #6 jab as suggested by FDA/CDC. I wonder if he'll get C19 again. I wonder if he'll add the new RSV shot (since he religiously takes all the flu shots and took the 2 shot new improved Shingles jab). I wonder over his every enduring ache and pain, every growth that appears - is this the 5-shot effect?