It wasn’t so long ago when the idea that the virus behind the COVID-19 pandemic “might have leaked from a Chinese laboratory” was “dismissed by many as a fringe conspiracy theory”.
Raphael while the lab leak story has seemed a viable explanation right from the outset given
- the proximity of the identified case with the lab
- the labs poor track record up to that point
- the funding of gain of function by the US
- the unlikeliness that a strain from a wild bat would jump to a human,
there are still a number of unanswered questions that raise bigger issues.
Given the available evidence that world populations have been in decline and in free fall in some countries why use Covid at all for population control?
There is also the nagging and important question of whether this bug actually exists.
I had thought that the virus- no virus debate was an unhelpful distraction from the core issues but I now think this needs to be unequivocally resolved for us to move forward.
If such a virus does not exist then we have a very different sort of discussion about why fear of a pandemic was used, for what and by whom.
But importantly if viruses per se don’t exist then the perpetrators “card house” collapses and the perpetual fear mongering about the next pandemic is no longer an effective tool for crowd control.
As such I don’t think we can dismiss this research any longer but need the best unbiased unconflicted minds to unequivocally resolve the issue because the science isn’t sufficiently settled for us to take the next step forward and only the truth will set us free.
I don’t underestimate the difficulty involved in this pursuit given the extremely powerful interest groups, of which virology as a discipline and big Pharma’s commercial interests are but two, and these pushing for proof
Of those deemed to have died from infection by a virus identified as SARS-CoV-2, are there some who did not die of it? I.e. is there a propaganda aim to be achieved by attributing deaths from other causes to SARS-CoV-2?
If there exists no such virus, how can the virus have escaped from a laboratory?
If there is such a virus, did it kill no one? Are the deaths attributed to the virus being attributed spuriously?
If inoculation was the (ultimate) purpose, was it a purpose from the outset? I.e.: let's invent a virus, release the virus, cause medical mayhem and precipitate the need for a jab, which will then (a) procure for us a material benefit and/or (b) cause further medical mayhem (with the aim of procuring further material benefit)?
Your blog interests me, because it portrays a viewpoint that runs counter to my own - which has been fed on the kinds of journalism you disparage - yet there are times when it seems a little like a blunderbuss: shooting off accusations against other, seemingly unrelated areas (like the election of Joe Biden in 2020, for instance).
I'm sympathetic to your arguments, and you phrase them well. But one can view the virus as what we're told it was: a virus, to which medicine responded in record time with a prophylactic of questionable merit. Or one can view it like the stories that led to the Southport riots in 2024, where groups with an agenda whipped up riotous crowds to attack persons and property based on false information about three murders in that town. Or one can view it like the 1999 Moscow residential tower bombings - which are strongly suspected to have been false flag operations. In Southport, the acts were spurred by an initial event, which was then hijacked for the rioters' own purposes. In Moscow, the event itself was purportedly engineered to provoke fear among the population.
I'm left at something of a loss, but your statement "maybe the bug failed" sounds either like a taunt or like genuine uncertainty on your part. If the latter, then, I repeat, "about what?"
Another nail in the coffin for Legacy media, all the corrupt news outlets, not to mention politicians & all the Blue states! Truly informed American people no longer trust all those previously mentioned! The greatest Scamdemic/Plandemic of our lifetime. Thank you again for never forgetting! I as well as many others will never forget. Appreciate all your courage & hard work! Don't ever let up! 👏👍🙏🇺🇸
"Not your fren...." The understatement of the week (so far). Of course the MSM is hummin' a different tune. The wind switched. Expected? Think so, I do. Bioweapon test run, imho. All (known) factors considered that makes sense to my straightedge mind. . . Please do continue to give 'em hell. They've earned every spark! "D"
Australian vaccine developer Professor Nikolai Petrovsky speaking during 2024 about early 2020 (from 13.50 on):
"...The best [ACE2] receptor was the human receptor, which said the virus had come from humans, and that didn't make a bit of sense, except if you think it came from human cells being cultured in a laboratory with the virus. And so we actually went live with that story in about April/May 2020..."
Potentially, Gidding from USyd is involved in a few mainstream COVID vaccine articles, one of which I have 'debunked'. Seems mostly to be scholars from UNSW and Melbourne unis.
Raphael while the lab leak story has seemed a viable explanation right from the outset given
- the proximity of the identified case with the lab
- the labs poor track record up to that point
- the funding of gain of function by the US
- the unlikeliness that a strain from a wild bat would jump to a human,
there are still a number of unanswered questions that raise bigger issues.
Given the available evidence that world populations have been in decline and in free fall in some countries why use Covid at all for population control?
There is also the nagging and important question of whether this bug actually exists.
I had thought that the virus- no virus debate was an unhelpful distraction from the core issues but I now think this needs to be unequivocally resolved for us to move forward.
If such a virus does not exist then we have a very different sort of discussion about why fear of a pandemic was used, for what and by whom.
But importantly if viruses per se don’t exist then the perpetrators “card house” collapses and the perpetual fear mongering about the next pandemic is no longer an effective tool for crowd control.
As such I don’t think we can dismiss this research any longer but need the best unbiased unconflicted minds to unequivocally resolve the issue because the science isn’t sufficiently settled for us to take the next step forward and only the truth will set us free.
I don’t underestimate the difficulty involved in this pursuit given the extremely powerful interest groups, of which virology as a discipline and big Pharma’s commercial interests are but two, and these pushing for proof
Maybe the bug failed, or maybe it wasn't the point. Maybe the point was the jab.
Hi, Raphael: failed to do what?
Is there such a thing as SARS-CoV-2?
Of those deemed to have died from infection by a virus identified as SARS-CoV-2, are there some who did not die of it? I.e. is there a propaganda aim to be achieved by attributing deaths from other causes to SARS-CoV-2?
If there exists no such virus, how can the virus have escaped from a laboratory?
If there is such a virus, did it kill no one? Are the deaths attributed to the virus being attributed spuriously?
If inoculation was the (ultimate) purpose, was it a purpose from the outset? I.e.: let's invent a virus, release the virus, cause medical mayhem and precipitate the need for a jab, which will then (a) procure for us a material benefit and/or (b) cause further medical mayhem (with the aim of procuring further material benefit)?
Your blog interests me, because it portrays a viewpoint that runs counter to my own - which has been fed on the kinds of journalism you disparage - yet there are times when it seems a little like a blunderbuss: shooting off accusations against other, seemingly unrelated areas (like the election of Joe Biden in 2020, for instance).
I'm sympathetic to your arguments, and you phrase them well. But one can view the virus as what we're told it was: a virus, to which medicine responded in record time with a prophylactic of questionable merit. Or one can view it like the stories that led to the Southport riots in 2024, where groups with an agenda whipped up riotous crowds to attack persons and property based on false information about three murders in that town. Or one can view it like the 1999 Moscow residential tower bombings - which are strongly suspected to have been false flag operations. In Southport, the acts were spurred by an initial event, which was then hijacked for the rioters' own purposes. In Moscow, the event itself was purportedly engineered to provoke fear among the population.
I'm left at something of a loss, but your statement "maybe the bug failed" sounds either like a taunt or like genuine uncertainty on your part. If the latter, then, I repeat, "about what?"
With my philosophy background, being uncertain, and pointing out that others are uncertain, is very much my thing.
Well, thanks for your response. But what are you uncertain about?
Literally everything except for my own existence. Everything's on the table. Maybe you're right about COVID, and everything else.
I can't accuse of you telling me what to think :-)
Thanks for taking the trouble to reply. I shall watch out for further instalments.
I wonder how long before the MSM and all the health industry bods walk back the 'millions of lives saved' to most likely 'zero lives saved'.
Here's hoping you never get labelled an 'expert' Raphael :) Keep up the good work !
Another nail in the coffin for Legacy media, all the corrupt news outlets, not to mention politicians & all the Blue states! Truly informed American people no longer trust all those previously mentioned! The greatest Scamdemic/Plandemic of our lifetime. Thank you again for never forgetting! I as well as many others will never forget. Appreciate all your courage & hard work! Don't ever let up! 👏👍🙏🇺🇸
"Not your fren...." The understatement of the week (so far). Of course the MSM is hummin' a different tune. The wind switched. Expected? Think so, I do. Bioweapon test run, imho. All (known) factors considered that makes sense to my straightedge mind. . . Please do continue to give 'em hell. They've earned every spark! "D"
Hiding behind lab leak story to hide real story that it was a BIOWEAPON FROM THE DOD
Australian vaccine developer Professor Nikolai Petrovsky speaking during 2024 about early 2020 (from 13.50 on):
"...The best [ACE2] receptor was the human receptor, which said the virus had come from humans, and that didn't make a bit of sense, except if you think it came from human cells being cultured in a laboratory with the virus. And so we actually went live with that story in about April/May 2020..."
https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/p/vaccine-developer-destroys-covid
Always was my theory being a big believer in the one world government and the need for eugengics, all to bring in the beast antichrist system.
What about your favourite place, Sydney Univ. Did someone there, lie?
Potentially, Gidding from USyd is involved in a few mainstream COVID vaccine articles, one of which I have 'debunked'. Seems mostly to be scholars from UNSW and Melbourne unis.