A practice started, incidentally, by Pasteur, who was keen to avoid having to explain the uptick in disease and death experienced immediately after administration of his miraculous vaccine. So he arbitrarily decided that he would accept no responsibility for adverse events in the 14 day period following vaccination and excluded them from his data. Plus ca change.....
Boosters were pushed due to vaccine efficacy waining heavily. There’s also studies showing that past 6-7 mos, the efficacy of these shots became negative.
This article shows that even your stated normal parameters of “testing” which are certainly reasonable, were not followed.
These shots were trash bud. Defending them at this point is like saying OJ ain’t guilty because he got off.
Have you seen the safety data from Western Australia btw?
A practice started, incidentally, by Pasteur, who was keen to avoid having to explain the uptick in disease and death experienced immediately after administration of his miraculous vaccine. So he arbitrarily decided that he would accept no responsibility for adverse events in the 14 day period following vaccination and excluded them from his data. Plus ca change.....
Boosters were pushed due to vaccine efficacy waining heavily. There’s also studies showing that past 6-7 mos, the efficacy of these shots became negative.
This article shows that even your stated normal parameters of “testing” which are certainly reasonable, were not followed.
These shots were trash bud. Defending them at this point is like saying OJ ain’t guilty because he got off.
Have you seen the safety data from Western Australia btw?