50 Comments
User's avatar
Yukon Dave's avatar

People should be going to jail not asking if they would consider our argument. Until we shove the crime they committed down their throats, they will do it again.

They forced people to have to make a choice between work and supporting their families or get injected with an experimental drug.

They lied and claimed that herd immunity would be reached with the injection, knowing it has never been done.

They lied that for the first time in history a corona virus could be stopped with an injection.

They lied and told scared parents to inject their kids or they could die.

Pfizer may have immunity from civil suits but not criminal ones that need to be done. Same for the people that funded the lab

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

And the people that approved it, promoted it, mandated it. We're coming for them all.

Expand full comment
Yukon Dave's avatar

And in the end I mock my doctor friends to this day about the Amish control groups that proved, everything they said and done was crap. Masks, social distancing, shut downs and injections all did not work and the ones that keep talking about it should lose their medical licenses.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Raphael, I've read a bit about what happened to you and I hope you are recovering from the entirely unnecessary injury inflicted on you by your employer as a result of their unreasonable management action, taken in an unreasonable manner. Please take them to the cleaners.

I have a question. I'm a bit concerned about the unchallenged claims I frequently see about the shots providing protection against severe illness and death. Have you seen this paper I've cited below by Peter McCullough and colleagues? You can access the PDF from the site at the link. Do you think the argument and conclusions, with respect to boosters, are reasonable? I do.

Yaffa Shir-Raz, Shay Zakov, Peter A McCullough (2023) The Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters against Severe Illness and Deaths: Scientific Fact. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Volume 28, Issue 1

The Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters against Severe Illness and Deaths: Scientific Fact

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=LzqEaOkAAAAJ&cstart=800&pagesize=100&citation_for_view=LzqEaOkAAAAJ:Xtec1x7NZGAC

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

Generally yes, I have stated this in various ways. My stuff on negative effectiveness, and my insistence that the myocarditis risk alone probably wipes out any 'benefit' of the jabs in the young and healthy at least. I've even shown that Pfizer kind of admits they don't know the benefits outweigh the risks as they don't know the extent of the CV risk. All this is easily overlooked, however, as I have a very small audience.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Thank you. I hope you are able to get a much bigger audience. I have been extremely suspicious of the purported efficacy against severe covid, hospitalization and death, ever since the narrative changed from "prevents infection and transmission" to this fall back position.

I can see how the elevated myocarditis risk alone would wipe out the benefit, if any, in the young and healthy. I can't see how there would be any benefit at all in the elderly, due to immunosenescence.

Expand full comment
Yukon Dave's avatar

I have sort of a rule and so do most courts. If you lie to me about almost everything, if you by chance say the truth, I am not checking your answers anymore. They are liars and kept changing their answer and are still tryiing to gas light us. Stuff the stupid in their face when they say that shit.

"I have been extremely suspicious of the purported efficacy against severe covid, hospitalization and death"

Expand full comment
Goldhoarder's avatar

Berson was right then... he is still right. It is gaslighting. If it was true that the disease was so deadly everybody needed to take the vaccine or die it would have been very easy to prove. The only thing they can point to is the original trial patients were younger. They didn't have elderly in the study.

https://x.com/AlexBerenson/status/1420839456228118535

Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

I am restacking and forwarding to all

I can think of— as well

as

adding it to X. If you

can get it under Elon’s nose—- he has 220 MILLION followers so it could get traction that way. He has the MIDAS touch.

Expand full comment
Jayne Doe's avatar

In "their" own words - "And No One Shall Give Them Shelter."

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

Wow, the comments. It looks like this guy got under a lot of people's skin. Maybe because you thought he'd be more of a middle of the ground type actual scholar but ended up just shilling for Big Pharma? Anyway, make sure to let him know exactly how you feel, politely, because you know he'll be here reading every comment. And Kirsch apparently texted this to him. Hi Jeff, and thanks for being a good sport!

Expand full comment
James Bryson's avatar

Stay STRONG outliers. The criminal-liars (crimes of omission and commission) are starting to crack.

Stay STRONG for the deceased, for the injured (current and pending). We the People, around the world need courageous, ethical, superbly educated-qualified CHAMPIONS.

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

"Despite Morris stating that we should be looking at the clinical trials and observational studies critically..."

If he'd followed his own advice during 2020, he could have helped prevent the "excess deaths" of these people in Ireland (and multiples of others around the world):

2020 = 1732

2021 = 4556

2022 = 5588

2023 = 5660

2024 = 5574

2025 = off to a bad start...

https://irelandexcessdeaths.com/excessdeaths

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

There were 18050 officially registered deaths in Northern Ireland during 2024. The last time that was exceeded was 1941.

Expand full comment
KarlM Alias's avatar

The UK changed the excess death algorithm (think in '22 or '23) to wipe out tens of thousands of excess deaths. Did Ireland do the same?

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

I don't think Ireland changed theirs, no. In any case, those figures from Ireland are independently added up using published Death Notices. Official UK deaths are already back above their artificially increased expectations - they're going to need a bigger algorithm!

Official excess of births over deaths in Northern Ireland (ie. UK statistics) each year from 2015 to 2024 were: 8667, 8646, 7039, 6907, 6689, 3201, 4483, 3678, 2708, 1366. This depopulation is caused both by increasing deaths, and also decreasing "live" births.

https://www.nisra.gov.uk/publications/monthly-births

Expand full comment
Tim Pallies's avatar

"going to need a bigger algorithm!" In even the most horrifying circumstances, the old "Jaws" reference makes me smile. Thanks for that!

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

A smile or two will do our health no harm Tim:

https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/top-20-vaccine-memes-2022-compilation

Expand full comment
Tim Pallies's avatar

Good stuff there. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Danielle's avatar

Australia did.

Expand full comment
Volker Birk's avatar

I would not call this “double standards” anymore. It clearly is fraud. The so called Covid “vaccines” are a disaster. There is zero benefit, but plenty of harm. The vendors knew that in advance, and most likely the public servants, too. The WHO protocol to not give antibiotics for pneumonia was murder from the WHO criminals and at least negligent homicide from the doctors following this protocol, because it is common sense to fight secondary infections wherever pneumonia is diagnosed. What was the treatment with experimental gene therapies when the harm was not only foreseeable but also foreseen?

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

There must indeed come a point where we can no longer chalk it up to mistake after mistake after mistake - the same mistakes done all over the world at the same time. Especially if the mistakes happen to enrich the global elite. At some point we must be allowed to wonder if it was by design.

Expand full comment
Tim Pallies's avatar

And every mistake favored widespread vax distribution. Vaxing young children for Covid? Sure. That made sense.

Expand full comment
PharmedOUT's avatar

As far as I am concerned, it WAS by design, if you read Dr. Peter Breggin’s book, written with his wife, award winning journalist Ginger Breggin, with introductions by Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D., MPH, Dr. Elizabeth Vliet, M.D., and Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko, M.D., which was published around October of 2021, one would definitely conclude it was “by design,” planned. Dr. Zelenko, who was bravely on the “front lines” of wanting to get the truth out, back then, has since passed away, as he lost his battle with Cancer. In any event, over time, I have bought 8 copies of their book, “Covid-19 And The Global Predators: We Are The Prey,” giving 3 copies to medical professionals that I deal with, 4 other copies to family and friends, and keeping one for myself, of course. This book goes into GREAT detail, of how these apparent crimes were planned for several years. I have not seen another book like it, as it goes into distinct, chronological detail of how this was planned. I want to know where Congress is on this, and the past, as well as, the current administration. Considering the present administration, this IS the “elephant in the room” for me. (I am neither Democrat or Republican)

Expand full comment
Patty Canter's avatar

We definitely need to continue warning our families and others, now about this bird flu vaccine, as the vaccine regulatory agencies are all broken down and basically the agencies have removed traffic lights, stop signs and speed limits for their products. If we were on a highway driving a car in this situation, we would warn others about how dangerous it is to drive, that there are a lot of wicked people on the road with no care about safety or your life, the police are not allowed to arrest anybody, and there is a need to take special precautions. We need to do the same with what is happening in the "vaccine" industry because the regulatory agencies have thrown out safety and efficacy as an issue and no one can arrest them for what they are doing--it is a dangerous highway that can take your life or result in terrible health problems. Thanks to Dr. McCullough and The Wellness Company and various other physicians and healthcare workers for warning us.

Expand full comment
From the Beach...🌞🇧🇷🏖️🌊🐬🌎😎's avatar

I am a C19 vaccine skeptic. Vax free. Firm believer in McCullough's early treatment protocols. Ivermectin is my hero.

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

Thank you for not complying!

Expand full comment
Jayne Doe's avatar

Maybe it's time to critique Jeffrey Morris's financials.

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

Wasn't gonna say nothin' but look at the people that gave money to his employer. Looks like they have partaken of that Bill Gates money. And lo, though it smelleth rotten it tasteth so sweet! https://www.med.upenn.edu/donorrecognition/donor-walls.html

Expand full comment
Marcin's avatar

It would be enough to expose his posts on his blog if someone has the time and desire. There is enough material there about what he believes in. The financial issues are just the icing on the cake

Expand full comment
Julie Hemmings's avatar

Yes it is. Full disclosure.

Expand full comment
Vince Ciroli's avatar

The harm done by these journals and so-called experts to the American Medical Establishment has reached to point of no return and to the point that people don't know the difference between good and bad and see all mainstream doctors and hospitals as suspect until proven otherwise. Until "justice" is served, and truth sees the light of day nothing will change minds.

Expand full comment
Danielle's avatar

Not just American.

Expand full comment
Valerie Peers's avatar

Follow the money Raphael.

Expand full comment
Marcin's avatar

Mr "the protocol was fine" Morris who belives in 95%.... oh no, thank you. I remember reading his articles 3-4 years ago on his blog. His answers and comments are even better or worse.

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

Where is the scholarly curiosity, huh? We just don't care that they didn't actually demonstrate a death benefit? As if that isn't the ultimate goal, to save lives? Scholars these days!

Expand full comment
Danielle's avatar

I hardly think that any of them can be called scholars these days. All are completely captured by their funding sources.

Expand full comment
H8SBAD's avatar

These people come in varying degrees of “amplification of Pharma lies,” so that the consumer has a choice. Morrison presents as Medium, whereas Offitt would be Large, and Hotez XXL.

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

You've framed it very nicely, and that may explain all this ill will toward him. I guess people feel like he really should have been more 'medium' and scholarly but maybe leaning towards the pro-jab side, like me but the other way, but despite all his bluster he just reiterates Big Pharma's narrative and doesn't really critique their claims as I do.

Expand full comment
Nancy Parsons's avatar

Great article, Raphael! You are doing beautiful work, please keep it coming.

One thought here: I live on a fixed retirement income (US Social Security). I can't afford to subscribe to every writer who's work I love, but I could occasionally send a small donation. Please see if you can enable your Substack to receive one time donations. I'd be delighted to contribute when I can.

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

Thank you. Not necessary, I'd only ever want people to become paid subscribers if they can really afford it. Not in it for the money. If I were I'd be taking Big Pharma's money to parrot the mainstream narratives like our buddy Morris here!

Expand full comment
Nancy Parsons's avatar

Like I said, you do beautiful work! Your generous heart makes me very happy.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

Triple standard as all vaccines, mRNA poisons and drugs are always deemed to be safe and effective right off the drawing board. It's up to the injured and the murdered to prove otherwise because not one soul in the government gives a rat's butt since they all get payoffs and perks. How many doctors preform express informed consent for all the drugs they dispense? How many even know what the inserts say?

Anybody seen otherwise? Have the 1986 vaccines laws ever been discussed for repealing? Statin trials ever done by independent testing? Cancer drug trials never manipulated? Many thousands have to be murdered before anyone considers lifting a finger except in the case of mRNA poisons where millions have been murdered and it still continues over 4 years later...NO QUESTIONS ASKED.

Expand full comment
CLIVE WILLIAM GRENVILLE's avatar

check out a page called the expose

Expand full comment
alice's avatar

So,will we avoid being duped again? They'll have to wait for next generation of ignorant to make the next big profit

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

I wish, but people are pretty stupid...

Expand full comment
alice's avatar

I know I was. Dodged any sideffects so far.

Expand full comment
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

The good news is our stupidity can be cured, and the cure is free, unlike whatever garbage Big Harma will try to sell us ;)

Expand full comment