As reported by the BBC, government-employed clinical psychologist Dr Stephen Wright took the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and died due to “unintended complications of the vaccine”, whilst being “fit and healthy”, and only 32 years of age.
When I was first told that people were dying from the vaccines it took quite a while for me to believe it. Then it took a while longer for me to believe that the vaccines were killing so many people. I just couldn't understand how that could be possible. Now, I'm still having a really hard time believing (understanding) how the majority of people aren't connecting all the excess deaths to the vaccines. I mean, how is that even possible?
They absolutely kill. Don't let the Branch Covidians try and ague otherwise. The only thing to debate is how many they are killing, and if this truly is outweighed by the benefits (does not seem so with the NNV figures from the UK government we reported on earlier). But they definitely kill.
Covid DISEASE is not the same as acquiring the Covid virus. Covid DISEASE is what happens AFTER infection with the virus. These terms were willfully misused in order to confuse people.
This "covers up" the fact that the mRNA vaccine does not prevent acquisition of the virus, and thus is essentially worthless in preventing infection. (nor does it prevent transmission). The claim that it (the jab) prevented Covid Disease was a claim that it was helpful AFTER someone was already infected- and supposedly prevented death and complications (this also proved to be highly manipulated/doctored data which was also ultimately not true- despite these initial false and inflated claims.
The IgG response is not a measure of effectiveness- because IGA antibodies of the immunoglobulin class prevent acquiring the infection on respiratory/epithelial surfaces.
The IGG antibody is simply a measure of the serum IGG levels- which come from both the "jab: and natural infection. Thus they are a marker of immune response to infection or vaccination but do not represent - not the ability to prevent new infection. This is why measuring IgG levels was a complete joke- they have nothing to do with what the public was told.
To add insult to injury, the initial Pfizer group did have a vaccinated group and a "control" group that was not vaccinated. This was touted to portray any effect the jab would have that was not seen in the control group not vaccinated- and then compare. What did Pfizer do? When side effects started appearing in the vaccinated group- Pfizer vaccinated the control group and then said they could not tell the difference between them.
Our elected representatives knew this- Congress exempted itself from a vaccine mandate! Despite knowing all the above- most went on to vaccinate as a means to prove a claimed "moral superiority "over the unvaccinated. - and to persecute the unvaccinated for political purposes.
The reason I came to reaalize this is because my best friend (going back to childhood) was a congressmen at the time. He had asked me to review what they had been told- which was obviously known before that gaslighting of the public with the mandates started.- He thus knew Congress was mandating a potential deadly vaccine without informing patients of the significant risk- in favt, the public was told there was "no risk"
Thus. military members. firefighters, and health care workers (among others) lost their jobs over politically driven mandates which have known health harms-( harms which are real, potentially devastating/life theratening and are going to become ever more severe and manifest) going forward.
The Congress Knew that the vaccine was dangerous. They covered it up and presented it as "safe and effective" to the public- and mandated it on this basis.
Congress have given vaccine manufactirers legal liability for their product. (Dating back to 1986).
Clearly, private employers do not have legal immunity for forcing /mandating a dangerous vaccine on their employees while falsely claiming there was no risk. The victims of the mRNA Covid shot have not been informed of the risks of the jabs they were forced to take, and deserve compensation for dnanges for what they have been involuntarily subjected to.
When I was first told that people were dying from the vaccines it took quite a while for me to believe it. Then it took a while longer for me to believe that the vaccines were killing so many people. I just couldn't understand how that could be possible. Now, I'm still having a really hard time believing (understanding) how the majority of people aren't connecting all the excess deaths to the vaccines. I mean, how is that even possible?
Nothing should surprise me anymore.
They absolutely kill. Don't let the Branch Covidians try and ague otherwise. The only thing to debate is how many they are killing, and if this truly is outweighed by the benefits (does not seem so with the NNV figures from the UK government we reported on earlier). But they definitely kill.
Of course, they lied. 🤥🤥🤥. It's what they do best
"Do health professionals really find it normal that young and healthy people die suddenly from “natural causes...?" THIS. WORD. SERIOUSLY.
Wow. so sorry for that young man. We dodged a bullet. Survived the adenovirus vector vaccine.
Covid DISEASE is not the same as acquiring the Covid virus. Covid DISEASE is what happens AFTER infection with the virus. These terms were willfully misused in order to confuse people.
This "covers up" the fact that the mRNA vaccine does not prevent acquisition of the virus, and thus is essentially worthless in preventing infection. (nor does it prevent transmission). The claim that it (the jab) prevented Covid Disease was a claim that it was helpful AFTER someone was already infected- and supposedly prevented death and complications (this also proved to be highly manipulated/doctored data which was also ultimately not true- despite these initial false and inflated claims.
The IgG response is not a measure of effectiveness- because IGA antibodies of the immunoglobulin class prevent acquiring the infection on respiratory/epithelial surfaces.
The IGG antibody is simply a measure of the serum IGG levels- which come from both the "jab: and natural infection. Thus they are a marker of immune response to infection or vaccination but do not represent - not the ability to prevent new infection. This is why measuring IgG levels was a complete joke- they have nothing to do with what the public was told.
To add insult to injury, the initial Pfizer group did have a vaccinated group and a "control" group that was not vaccinated. This was touted to portray any effect the jab would have that was not seen in the control group not vaccinated- and then compare. What did Pfizer do? When side effects started appearing in the vaccinated group- Pfizer vaccinated the control group and then said they could not tell the difference between them.
Our elected representatives knew this- Congress exempted itself from a vaccine mandate! Despite knowing all the above- most went on to vaccinate as a means to prove a claimed "moral superiority "over the unvaccinated. - and to persecute the unvaccinated for political purposes.
The reason I came to reaalize this is because my best friend (going back to childhood) was a congressmen at the time. He had asked me to review what they had been told- which was obviously known before that gaslighting of the public with the mandates started.- He thus knew Congress was mandating a potential deadly vaccine without informing patients of the significant risk- in favt, the public was told there was "no risk"
Thus. military members. firefighters, and health care workers (among others) lost their jobs over politically driven mandates which have known health harms-( harms which are real, potentially devastating/life theratening and are going to become ever more severe and manifest) going forward.
The Congress Knew that the vaccine was dangerous. They covered it up and presented it as "safe and effective" to the public- and mandated it on this basis.
Congress have given vaccine manufactirers legal liability for their product. (Dating back to 1986).
Clearly, private employers do not have legal immunity for forcing /mandating a dangerous vaccine on their employees while falsely claiming there was no risk. The victims of the mRNA Covid shot have not been informed of the risks of the jabs they were forced to take, and deserve compensation for dnanges for what they have been involuntarily subjected to.