Heart damage for all COVID-19 vaccinees?

We were told that the COVID-19 jab and its products stays around the injection site, and only for a few days, though later found this was false, as these have been found in the heart and elsewhere, coincidentally correlating with an increase in heart problems. We now have yet more evidence that what we were told was misinformation.

A study has been published in the long-running Radiology journal (Nakahara et al.), which indicates that COVID-19 “Vaccinated patients had overall higher myocardial FDG uptake compared to nonvaccinated patients (median SUVmax, 4.8 [IQR: 3.0-8.5] vs median SUVmax, 3.3 [IQR: 2.5-6.2]; P < .0001). Myocardial SUVmax was higher in vaccinated patients regardless of sex (median range, 4.7-4.9 [IQR: 2.9-8.6]) or patient age (median range, 4.7-5.6 [IQR: 2.9-8.6]) compared to corresponding nonvaccinated groups (sex median range, 3.2-3.9 [IQR: 2.4-7.2]; age median range, 3.3-3.3 [IQR: 2.3-6.1]; P range, <.001-.015). Furthermore, increased myocardial FDG uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120, and 121-180 days after their second vaccination (median SUVmax range, 4.6-5.1 [IQR: 2.9-8.6]) and increased ipsilateral axillary uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120 days after their 2nd vaccination (median SUVmax range, 1.5-2.0 [IQR: 1.2-3.4]) compared to the nonvaccinated patients (P range, <.001-<.001).” Source. This led to an editorial in the same journal issue, by Bluemke, who stated: “The study results by Nakahara et al suggest that mild asymptomatic myocardial inflammation could be more common than we ever expected.” Source.

Okay then.

Extra: The unjabbed, including myself, have been treated terribly during these troubling times, and numerous legal actions have been launched as a result. What will the jabbed do as it becomes more obvious over time that they have been damaged by the pharmaceutical products they were coerced into taking?