As long as the authorities aren't reacting and the media aren't reporting then the general public will remain in ignorance unless they have the misfortune to die suddenly. The chances are, if they die suddenly, everyone around them will think it was just one of those unfortunate tragedies that sometimes happen - after all, nothing in life is certain. Most people seem totally convinced that the jabs are "safe and effective", have been properly tested, don't kill people and have saved "millions of lives". Most people took several jabs and aren't dead so they are obviously safe. Any subsequent illness such as dvt or undiagnosed stage 4 cancer or heart problems are put down to the vagaries of life. I don't know how this will change because both the authorities and the media are too vested in the narrative to change.
Yes, so the ultimate measure may be to compare jabbed and unjabbed. Would look weird if the unjabbed had 5x as many cardiac problems. But even then, the data we have is fudged.
For that to happen, both the media and the authorities would have to acknowledge there might be a problem because why else would they need to compare when the unjabbed are only at catastrophic risk from covid and the jabbed aren't - any other death/illness has nothing to do with the jabs. To compare such things would be to imply maybe that's not actually the case. If I were a high profile pro-jabber I really wouldn't want anyone looking into such comparisons in case I subsequently got lynched!
As long as the authorities aren't reacting and the media aren't reporting then the general public will remain in ignorance unless they have the misfortune to die suddenly. The chances are, if they die suddenly, everyone around them will think it was just one of those unfortunate tragedies that sometimes happen - after all, nothing in life is certain. Most people seem totally convinced that the jabs are "safe and effective", have been properly tested, don't kill people and have saved "millions of lives". Most people took several jabs and aren't dead so they are obviously safe. Any subsequent illness such as dvt or undiagnosed stage 4 cancer or heart problems are put down to the vagaries of life. I don't know how this will change because both the authorities and the media are too vested in the narrative to change.
Yes, so the ultimate measure may be to compare jabbed and unjabbed. Would look weird if the unjabbed had 5x as many cardiac problems. But even then, the data we have is fudged.
For that to happen, both the media and the authorities would have to acknowledge there might be a problem because why else would they need to compare when the unjabbed are only at catastrophic risk from covid and the jabbed aren't - any other death/illness has nothing to do with the jabs. To compare such things would be to imply maybe that's not actually the case. If I were a high profile pro-jabber I really wouldn't want anyone looking into such comparisons in case I subsequently got lynched!
This is all just so heart breaking.
Presumably, the mainstream media are all still card-carrying members of the Trusted News Initiative?
https://www.bbc.com/mediacentre/2022/trusted-news-initiative-creates-asia-pacific-network