Congratulations on the promotion. The sociopaths funded by Gates and the international drug cartel (i.e. Big Pharma) targeted you for daring to tell the truth. Nice job.
It turns out the more people who bought into the false narrative, the lower the odds a conspiracy will ever be exposed. This is counter-intuitive. One would think the more people who were involved, the greater the chance someone important would come forward and blow up the entire scandal. But, apparently, the opposite is true. Everyone (who matters) has a strong motivation to conceal the truth ... Or not admit they were also wrong ... and thus complicit in "crimes against humanity."
Yes. I don't think anyone who was anywhere the coercive jabbing will ever admit any wrongdoing because to do so would be an admission of their complicity in all the deaths and injuries.
Almost everyone contributed to the injuries and deaths simply by complying, they reinforced the propaganda, and mums the word now. Honestly the world is filled with hypocrites and gobshites.
100%. We unjabbed have to live with the uncomfortable fact that every single person that took the jab, and reported it, so that they could keep their jobs and go to the pub, has hurt us. Directly or indirectly. They either persecuted us or allowed it to happen.
The NYT is back pedaling because other countries have done so. If they do not follow suit, they will risk losing credibility with their readers who will hear the news from other sources. They are just covering their basis, a strategic self-preserving move. Regardless, we need more of those moves, and we will get them as the truth keeps surfacing.
Also, journalists and editors at The New York Times know (or should know) that the mortality risk from Covid is/was microscopic for virtually every person in the world. They would know this if they simply investigated and then "confirmed" the copious evidence of "early spread." This evidence proves that this was NOT a "deadly" virus - as millions of people had been infected by the end of 2019 or the first month of 2020 - and there was no spike in all-cause deaths.
I have emailed the "Reader Tip" address of the NY Times multiple times presenting this evidence and asking Times' "journalists" to follow-up with their own investigations. I have never received a response. This confirms to me that our "watchdog" press will not investigate anything they do not want to confirm (because said honest investigations would detonate the authorized narrative).
I wish some editor or journalist at the NY Times would at least read this article ... and tell me why my assertion is wrong.
One of the most compelling "early" Covid cases comes from a man who made a post in the NY Times' Reader Comment section in April 2020. This subscriber - "Shane from Marin County, California" - describes his Covid symptoms in great detail. He also reports that he had Covid in the "fall" of 2019 - "far earlier than anyone else I've heard of." Furthermore, this man gives the two labs where he got TWO different positive antibody tests in late April 2020.
In other words, the New York Times had a very credible or compelling report of possible Case Zero in America in April 2020. Since this man was a paid subscriber (and only paid subscribers can make posts at the Times' moderated Reader Comment section), it would have been easy for the Times to track this man down and follow-up on his jaw-dropping claim.
But the NY Times did NOT do this. They must know about Shane's post because I emailed the paper at least four times telling them what Shane had said in their very own website Comment section.
They also never followed up on the claim of Belleville, NJ mayor Michael Melham, who believes he had Covid in November 2019. Mayor Melham also got two different positive antibody results.
See "Case 1" (Mayor Melham) and "Case 3" (Shane) for more details of Americans with almost-certain early cases of Covid that neither the press or public health officials were willing to investigate (and thus, perchance, "confirm").
The risk of "healthy" children dying from Covid is approximately 1-in-2-million. The odds a child would be struck by lightning are much greater. So even the statement that Covid poses an "extremely low" risk to children is an intentional exaggeration. The mortality risk for healthy children is actually 0.000 percent. One has to go out to four decimal points to pick up any "Covid deaths."
Here's a story about an ignored UK study that PROVES this assertion.
Right. I had a conversation with a friend yesterday who wore a mask all the time. He refused to believe masks were useless. Now that the mainstream is saying as much, he is forced to go along, with the caveat that people did not know this until recently. We argued on that point for quite a while. He also believes the stats on covid deaths are correct and refuses to believe all the tricks the hospitals used to create a false impression. He says there are experts on both sides of the issue so how do you know who to believe, I said simple, those with conflicts of interest are less believable than those risking their careers to give their expert views.
Hence my research on myocarditis in the young. For every life apparently saved from COVID we need to cause hundreds of cases of myocarditis? Just myocarditis. What proportion of them will be dead in 5 years? Just 1% and it's already not worth it. Would be good to know, hey, before injecting all the children of the world?
Congratulations on the promotion. The sociopaths funded by Gates and the international drug cartel (i.e. Big Pharma) targeted you for daring to tell the truth. Nice job.
Going by the Labor guys response to this speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scFydFjEVLw our rulers are not about to admit anything is wrong any time soon.
It turns out the more people who bought into the false narrative, the lower the odds a conspiracy will ever be exposed. This is counter-intuitive. One would think the more people who were involved, the greater the chance someone important would come forward and blow up the entire scandal. But, apparently, the opposite is true. Everyone (who matters) has a strong motivation to conceal the truth ... Or not admit they were also wrong ... and thus complicit in "crimes against humanity."
Yes. I don't think anyone who was anywhere the coercive jabbing will ever admit any wrongdoing because to do so would be an admission of their complicity in all the deaths and injuries.
Almost everyone contributed to the injuries and deaths simply by complying, they reinforced the propaganda, and mums the word now. Honestly the world is filled with hypocrites and gobshites.
100%. We unjabbed have to live with the uncomfortable fact that every single person that took the jab, and reported it, so that they could keep their jobs and go to the pub, has hurt us. Directly or indirectly. They either persecuted us or allowed it to happen.
The NYT is back pedaling because other countries have done so. If they do not follow suit, they will risk losing credibility with their readers who will hear the news from other sources. They are just covering their basis, a strategic self-preserving move. Regardless, we need more of those moves, and we will get them as the truth keeps surfacing.
Also, journalists and editors at The New York Times know (or should know) that the mortality risk from Covid is/was microscopic for virtually every person in the world. They would know this if they simply investigated and then "confirmed" the copious evidence of "early spread." This evidence proves that this was NOT a "deadly" virus - as millions of people had been infected by the end of 2019 or the first month of 2020 - and there was no spike in all-cause deaths.
I have emailed the "Reader Tip" address of the NY Times multiple times presenting this evidence and asking Times' "journalists" to follow-up with their own investigations. I have never received a response. This confirms to me that our "watchdog" press will not investigate anything they do not want to confirm (because said honest investigations would detonate the authorized narrative).
I wish some editor or journalist at the NY Times would at least read this article ... and tell me why my assertion is wrong.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-covid-ifr-percentage-was-a-scandalous?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
One of the most compelling "early" Covid cases comes from a man who made a post in the NY Times' Reader Comment section in April 2020. This subscriber - "Shane from Marin County, California" - describes his Covid symptoms in great detail. He also reports that he had Covid in the "fall" of 2019 - "far earlier than anyone else I've heard of." Furthermore, this man gives the two labs where he got TWO different positive antibody tests in late April 2020.
In other words, the New York Times had a very credible or compelling report of possible Case Zero in America in April 2020. Since this man was a paid subscriber (and only paid subscribers can make posts at the Times' moderated Reader Comment section), it would have been easy for the Times to track this man down and follow-up on his jaw-dropping claim.
But the NY Times did NOT do this. They must know about Shane's post because I emailed the paper at least four times telling them what Shane had said in their very own website Comment section.
They also never followed up on the claim of Belleville, NJ mayor Michael Melham, who believes he had Covid in November 2019. Mayor Melham also got two different positive antibody results.
See "Case 1" (Mayor Melham) and "Case 3" (Shane) for more details of Americans with almost-certain early cases of Covid that neither the press or public health officials were willing to investigate (and thus, perchance, "confirm").
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/covid-was-spreading-across-us-in
The risk of "healthy" children dying from Covid is approximately 1-in-2-million. The odds a child would be struck by lightning are much greater. So even the statement that Covid poses an "extremely low" risk to children is an intentional exaggeration. The mortality risk for healthy children is actually 0.000 percent. One has to go out to four decimal points to pick up any "Covid deaths."
Here's a story about an ignored UK study that PROVES this assertion.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-greatest-covid-lie?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Right. I had a conversation with a friend yesterday who wore a mask all the time. He refused to believe masks were useless. Now that the mainstream is saying as much, he is forced to go along, with the caveat that people did not know this until recently. We argued on that point for quite a while. He also believes the stats on covid deaths are correct and refuses to believe all the tricks the hospitals used to create a false impression. He says there are experts on both sides of the issue so how do you know who to believe, I said simple, those with conflicts of interest are less believable than those risking their careers to give their expert views.
Hence my research on myocarditis in the young. For every life apparently saved from COVID we need to cause hundreds of cases of myocarditis? Just myocarditis. What proportion of them will be dead in 5 years? Just 1% and it's already not worth it. Would be good to know, hey, before injecting all the children of the world?