Negative effectiveness & natural immunity in the MSM, and another expert comes round?

Photo by Martin Sanchez on Unsplash

It was only a few days ago that we added to our ongoing reporting on COVID-19 vaccine negative effectiveness (the notion that the jabs make COVID-19 infection, and even death, more likely), and now we can add to that some more evidence and a source from the mainstream news.

As reported in The Washington Post, by MSM-approved expert Dr Leana Wen, it may be time to ease COVID-19 vaccine mandates for those with natural immunity, which apparently is pretty much everybody by now. She says: “It’s crucial to discuss immunity from infection, because abundant research shows natural immunity conveys excellent protection against covid. One Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study found that vaccinated people who never had covid were at least three times as likely to be infected as unvaccinated people with prior infection. And a Lancet study found that those who were vaccinated but never had covid were four times as likely to have severe illness resulting in hospitalization or death compared to the unvaccinated who recovered from it. Protection from natural immunity also wanes at a slower rate than from vaccination. A recent large Israeli study published in the New England Journal of Medicine compared two groups of people: one that had been vaccinated and never had covid before, and another that never received vaccines but had recently recovered from covid. The results are striking: Two months after their shots, members of the first group had twice the number of infections as the second. And after six months, the first group’s infection rate was nearly three times higher than the second’s.” The double-dosed “are almost certainly less protected from covid than people who have had the virus”, which “is most of the unvaccinated”. She adds that there is precedent for vaccine exemptions based on prior infections, and - as ‘conspiracy theorists’ had been warning about from the beginning - that the jabs can cause serious side effects. Source.

This is the same Dr Leana Wen who earlier was happy to discriminate against the unvaccinated and demonise them, accusing them of being “more likely to be infected and thus to spread coronavirus”, and equating them with drunk drivers. Source.

Okay then.

A little extra: If the US government’s own researchers now know that the unvaccinated are better protected against COVID-19, and other experts and mainstream news outlets - American and otherwise - also know this, why are there still laws on the books around the world discriminating against the unvaccinated? Why are the unvaccinated-and-currently-uninfected still prevented from going to places that the vaccinated-but-currently-infected can access? And why are our leaders so keen to jab healthy children, who are the least at risk from COVID-19? Can you answer such questions without sounding like a conspiracy theorist?