Negative effectiveness now applies to masks?

We have seen much evidence for COVID-19 vaccine negative effectiveness, the notion that the jabs actually increase the chance of COVID-19 infection (and in some cases hospitalisation and death). When it comes to face masks, we already knew they didn’t work, and may have harmed as well, but now we have some evidence for face mask negative effectiveness.

A new study published by Cambridge University Press has Norwegian researchers explaining: “We examined the association between face masks and risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 using cross-sectional data from 3,209 participants in a randomized trial of using glasses to reduce the risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2. Face mask use was based on participants’ response to the end-of-follow-up survey. We found that the incidence of self-reported COVID-19 was 33% (aRR 1.33; 95% CI 1.03 - 1.72) higher in those wearing face masks often or sometimes, and 40% (aRR 1.40; 95% CI 1.08 - 1.82) higher in those wearing face masks almost always or always, compared to participants who reported wearing face masks never or almost never.” They found: “The risk was 1.74 (1.38 to 2.18) times higher in those who wore face masks often or sometimes and 1.75 (1.39 to 2.21) times higher in those who wore face masks almost always or always, compared to participants who reported never or almost never wore masks (reference group).” Source.

Okay then.

Extra: Further support to the case against masking has also been provided by Professor Dame Jenny Harries, former Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England, who explained that “the evidence that coverings reduced transmission is ‘uncertain’ because it is difficult to separate their effect from other Covid curbs”, further noting that “government advice on how to make a mask using two pieces of cloth was ‘ineffective’”. She also said that “at least three were needed for even a small effect on the spread of viruses”, and that “advice for the public to wear masks during the pandemic may even have given people a ‘false sense of security’ that they could reduce their risk of becoming infected if they wore one while mixing with others”. Source. With it looking increasingly like that all these measures have done no good, and likely have done a fair bit of harm, do you reckon we’re owed a bit of justice?