With our last entry covering more data that the COVID-19 vaccines have negative effectiveness in terms of infections, we now come upon further evidence that this also applies to hospitalisations and deaths, due to another study (Butt et al.) published by Oxford University Press.
"We see 390 hospitalisations and deaths from 15,660 ‘primary series complete, no booster’ participants. That is 2.49%. We see 549 hospitalisations and deaths from 20,568 ‘primary series complete, no booster’ participants. That is 2.67%."
Both categories state "primary series complete, no booster". Should the latter say WITH booster?
Great post, I added this to my off line library file.
Also, that is exactly why I made this site, so thank you again. To serve as a repository of interesting evidences against the mainstream narratives, with little to no commentary/ranting/unsubstantiated claims.
Yeah, unfortunately the mainstream narrative-driven news and Fake Checkers always get the front page coverage and last word. They will ignore, spin, and rinse....
Otherwise, these death shots would have ended two years ago.
The general public still think the jabs were/are "safe and effective" and have "saved millions of lives". Many of them will continue getting jabbed and will simply assume any deaths or illnesses amongst friends and relations are bad luck because "people get ill and die all the time". Nobody in authority, the health service or the media are going to tell them otherwise - most of them are jabbed and most of them believe exactly what the general public believe.
As far as I can tell, the “popular press” or corporate legacy media has no problem saying things like “safe and effective” over and over again no matter how much evidence accumulates to the contrary. They don’t have to footnote or link to sources, and they don’t allow comments on their websites, so they create a hermetic disinformation bubble which a majority (or large plurality) of people are too fearful and lazy to look outside of.
According to a letter to The Lancet on Nov 19th 2021, almost 90% of British covid cases in the over-60's were amongst the double vaccinated, while less than 4% were amongst the vaccine-free.
According to a UK gov report dated Sept 17th 2021, 63% of Delta deaths were amongst the double vaccinated with just 28% of deaths in the vaccine-free. Deaths were mostly in the over-50's. The graphic that starts on page 19 & ends on page 20 of the gov report shows 722 UNvaccinated delta deaths but 1613 deaths in the double vaccinated.
So by late 2021 I had no reason to doubt that 90% of British cases & 63% of resulting deaths were in the double vaccinated.
Having another look at the gov stats because my analysis above compared only the double vaccinated deaths with the unvaccinated deaths. This time I am calculating ALL vaccinated deaths from Delta, not just those double vaccinated.
There are 17 deaths within the first 21 days of the first vaccine. There are 149 deaths post 21 days after the first vaccine & there are 1613 deaths starting 14 days post second vaccine. There are also 722 deaths amongst the unvaccinated.
17 + 149 + 1613 = 1779 vaccinated dead + 722 unvaccinated dead. This takes our total dead to 2501.
Employing a percentage calculator, we find that 1779 is 71% of the total 2501 dead. So 71% of those reported by UK gov to have died of Delta by Sept 2021 were vaccinated at least once & only 29% of the dead were unvaccinated. Which makes it look to my eyes as if being vaccinated makes one THREE times as likely to be killed by a covid-related illness than remaining unvaccinated.
And this is ONLY those vaccinated who have caught covid & then died. This says NOTHING AT ALL about the numerous deadly side-effects such as myocarditis & stroke etc that have driven excess deaths since mid-2021, or anything about the longer-term immune system disorders or the resulting cancers that have now also begun to emerge.
We need to be careful of proportions, but yes, we now see negative efficacy and other side effects galore. Certainly doesn't look very 'safe and effective' right now.
All we can do is extrapolate for ourselves, while those meant to inform us of &, God forbid, protect us from medical folly, are performing cover-ups & censorship for those producing the medical folly in the first place.
Until the powers-that-be step up to the plate & come clean, which is frankly looking less likely by the week, we're going to have little other than speculation based on our extrapolations to go on.
I agree we need to be careful. It's a shame those on the receiving end of our ire haven't been as careful with us.
Please clarify. You state
"We see 390 hospitalisations and deaths from 15,660 ‘primary series complete, no booster’ participants. That is 2.49%. We see 549 hospitalisations and deaths from 20,568 ‘primary series complete, no booster’ participants. That is 2.67%."
Both categories state "primary series complete, no booster". Should the latter say WITH booster?
Great post, I added this to my off line library file.
Thank you, fixed. Really need an editor, but can't afford it. Yet.
Also, that is exactly why I made this site, so thank you again. To serve as a repository of interesting evidences against the mainstream narratives, with little to no commentary/ranting/unsubstantiated claims.
"...do you think we’re still going to be saying the jabs are ‘safe and effective’ for much longer? "
The general populace may not, buy the political and medical establishment will never admit anything different.
Yeah, unfortunately the mainstream narrative-driven news and Fake Checkers always get the front page coverage and last word. They will ignore, spin, and rinse....
Otherwise, these death shots would have ended two years ago.
The general public still think the jabs were/are "safe and effective" and have "saved millions of lives". Many of them will continue getting jabbed and will simply assume any deaths or illnesses amongst friends and relations are bad luck because "people get ill and die all the time". Nobody in authority, the health service or the media are going to tell them otherwise - most of them are jabbed and most of them believe exactly what the general public believe.
As far as I can tell, the “popular press” or corporate legacy media has no problem saying things like “safe and effective” over and over again no matter how much evidence accumulates to the contrary. They don’t have to footnote or link to sources, and they don’t allow comments on their websites, so they create a hermetic disinformation bubble which a majority (or large plurality) of people are too fearful and lazy to look outside of.
Nov 19th - https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00258-1/Fulltext
Sept 17th. Page 19/20 - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018547/Technical_Briefing_23_21_09_16.pdf
According to a letter to The Lancet on Nov 19th 2021, almost 90% of British covid cases in the over-60's were amongst the double vaccinated, while less than 4% were amongst the vaccine-free.
According to a UK gov report dated Sept 17th 2021, 63% of Delta deaths were amongst the double vaccinated with just 28% of deaths in the vaccine-free. Deaths were mostly in the over-50's. The graphic that starts on page 19 & ends on page 20 of the gov report shows 722 UNvaccinated delta deaths but 1613 deaths in the double vaccinated.
So by late 2021 I had no reason to doubt that 90% of British cases & 63% of resulting deaths were in the double vaccinated.
Having another look at the gov stats because my analysis above compared only the double vaccinated deaths with the unvaccinated deaths. This time I am calculating ALL vaccinated deaths from Delta, not just those double vaccinated.
There are 17 deaths within the first 21 days of the first vaccine. There are 149 deaths post 21 days after the first vaccine & there are 1613 deaths starting 14 days post second vaccine. There are also 722 deaths amongst the unvaccinated.
17 + 149 + 1613 = 1779 vaccinated dead + 722 unvaccinated dead. This takes our total dead to 2501.
Employing a percentage calculator, we find that 1779 is 71% of the total 2501 dead. So 71% of those reported by UK gov to have died of Delta by Sept 2021 were vaccinated at least once & only 29% of the dead were unvaccinated. Which makes it look to my eyes as if being vaccinated makes one THREE times as likely to be killed by a covid-related illness than remaining unvaccinated.
And this is ONLY those vaccinated who have caught covid & then died. This says NOTHING AT ALL about the numerous deadly side-effects such as myocarditis & stroke etc that have driven excess deaths since mid-2021, or anything about the longer-term immune system disorders or the resulting cancers that have now also begun to emerge.
Page 19 & 20 - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018547/Technical_Briefing_23_21_09_16.pdf
We need to be careful of proportions, but yes, we now see negative efficacy and other side effects galore. Certainly doesn't look very 'safe and effective' right now.
All we can do is extrapolate for ourselves, while those meant to inform us of &, God forbid, protect us from medical folly, are performing cover-ups & censorship for those producing the medical folly in the first place.
Until the powers-that-be step up to the plate & come clean, which is frankly looking less likely by the week, we're going to have little other than speculation based on our extrapolations to go on.
I agree we need to be careful. It's a shame those on the receiving end of our ire haven't been as careful with us.