13 Comments
Oct 20Liked by Raphael Lataster, PhD

Raphael is a breath of fresh air on the Australian landscape.

Expand full comment
Oct 20Liked by Raphael Lataster, PhD

It mystifies me, this use of "redacted", to deny and contradict all of our cultural/historical values and our presumed democratic rights.

Expand full comment
Oct 20Liked by Raphael Lataster, PhD

Excellent summary Raphael, thanks. I think you mean “redacted “ not “retracted” re the FOIA.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, will have to fix, thank you.

Expand full comment

TGA and ATAGI can never be trusted. I remember being at my docs (to get a skin cancer removed - one of the downsides of being a Queenslander !), when the jabs were just being rolled out, and seeing a poster encouraging pregnant women (or persons if you prefer) to get jabbed, and I knew at the time from having read the documents that Pfizer released (the one with the .84% ARR) that there was no safety data for pregnant people, yet TGA and ATAGI were saying it was safe. Utter crap.

Expand full comment

Agree that TGA works for Big Pharma. Then why would TGA do any real testing, because it would be inconvenient if testing leads to product rejection and losses of millions in investment? The TGA budget shows 80-90 percent expenditure goes to salaries, with zero capital depreciation, which would be significant if they have laboratories with expensive equipment. Like others in Australia, TGA is a fake regulator, lying and bluffing, knowing they can withhold incriminating information, even with FOI.

Expand full comment

It sounds like their very existence is a con job. Could it be that, like courts, tribunals, commissions, royal commissions etc, their primary role and function is to cover the arse of the government?

Expand full comment

The government makes all senior appointments.

Expand full comment

Thank you. Excellent summary.

Expand full comment

Maybe it's just me, but finding an "acceptable" level of DNA contamination in an already toxic mRNA genetic therapeutic doesn't sound so good to me. How long should a genetic therapeutic be "rigorously" tested to determine if it can trigger cancer in humans...a year, 5 years, 15 years?

Expand full comment

What's not to trust: DARPA has openly bragged on Twitter that Moderna’s mRNA vaccine technology, and by extension Moderna’s Covid vaccine, was a product of their ADEPT program, however, research shows that Moderna did not merely apply for a patent in 2016 with US9587003B2: as reported in the Daily Mail. They actually applied in 2013 for 4 patents with US9149506B2, US9216205B2, US9255129B2, US9301993B2, as well for their “Covid-19 virus” patent #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG

ADEPT is a Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (“DARPA”) program that began in 2012. The acronym stands for Autonomous Diagnostics to Enable Prevention and Therapeutics. PROTECT is a sub-program of ADEPT, and it stands for Prophylactic Options to Environmental and Contagious Threats

“We have a commercially interested group of sociopaths who want to make money while killing people,” Dr. Martin said, “that’s the bottom line.”

On Wednesday, Dr. David E. Martin joined Alex Jones to explain where the biological weapon called SARS-CoV-2 originated, who are the criminals behind it, the criminal counts against the perpetrators and much more.

In 1990, Pfizer filed the first patent for a vaccine for coronavirus.

In 1999, Ralph Baric’s modification and manipulation programme took what used to be a respiratory and gastrointestinal bug and turned it into something that would cause cardiomyopathy in rabbits. This gave rise to a patent that was filed in 2002 for an infectious, replication defective, clone of coronavirus.

In 2014, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill was authorised to waive the gain-of-function moratorium. The pathogen they were working on at the time was the Wuhan Institute of Virology virus 1 (“WIV-1”) spike protein, Dr. Martin said. In 2016 they said WIV-1 was poised for human emergence.

Donald Trump's tenure as the 45th president of the United States began with his inauguration on January 20, 2017, and ended on January 20, 2021. Wikipedia - note "2017-2021"

“In 2018/2019,” he said, “The United States government reclaimed the patent from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. The Department of Health and Human Services at the National Institutes of Health took the UNC Chapel Hill patent on an infectious, replication defective coronavirus and reclaimed title and interest to it. (Those who pull puppet Trump's strings: 2017-2021)

On 18 September 2019, they said that by 20 September 2020, the world would accept a universal vaccine. And, as Dr. Martin said, “they said, ‘they would do so in response … to an accidental or deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen’.” They had been planning these mandatory injections since 2015.

“To advance the social and commercial interests of sociopaths that wanted to kill human beings for the sake of their agenda, they decided to unleash a lethal respiratory pathogen on the population so the population would be bamboozled into taking an mRNA shot which would permanently, permanently alter their human condition,” Dr. Martin said.

“The Supreme Court ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human. That means Bill and Melinda Gates, The Department of Defense, [and others] can literally own a human being. If this synthetic code is taken up into your genome, by law, you could be owned overnight.”

The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your genetic code, making you “genetically-modified.” Granted mainstream media say the foregoing is “conspiracy theory.” But Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) the shots change your genetic code and 2) the shots do not stop the spread of COVID-19. He says the Moderna shot is “hacking the software of life” (at the 0:43 second mark, but the whole video is…disturbing).

Viral vectors do the same thing.

So do these companies “own you” once you get the shots? Well, they own mice and bacteria created with their inventions. Once you get these shots, you are no longer a “naturally-occurring” human being. Prosthetic limbs, breast implants, etc. are not “natural” per se. But they are removable and not part of what fundamentally makes you human. Gene therapy is irreversible.

Moderna wins Covid-19 shot patent case against Pfizer-BioNTech in Europe May 18, 2024, 07:01 PM Pfizer-BioNTech who used Moderna Virus 2013: #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG to make their vaccine from. That "virus" you got "a vaccine" for: Thank Bill Gates.

Trump's Secret Contract signed for the US Army Pfizer Contract

https://www.keionline.org/misc-docs/DOD-ATI-Pfizer-Technical-Direction-Letter-OTA-W15QKN-16-9-1002-21July2020.pdf

Operation Warp Speed 3rd Paragraph down - the US Army distributed the Covid vaccines everywhere, for them to be administered into all of you - it was a US Army "experiment".

It is the US Army which is managing the Genetic Modified Super Soldier program, as a follow on from after the Gene Therapy Injections (GMO's) for those suitable, who survive the vaccines, presumably.

It would probably have been the US Army who would have the Ground Based Energy Weapon used in Hawaii recently, to remove and modify the area, for new building construction, etc.

The vaccinated are countermeasure prototypes, for the US Army, to see the objective of a Covid-19 (vaccines) countermeasure, in the impairment of the operational effectiveness of enemy activity" by spike protein,the most antigenic and toxic part of a coronavirus" (vaccine) based on the measurable effects of their (the vaccines) deployment", by the US military's own definitions of terms used in Operation Warp Speed contracts, the (vaccine) products it commissioned "amount to bioweapons" and the vaccinated are part of the US Army experiment to see the effectiveness of their Covid-19 vaccines weapon, as explained below:

The injection of these "countermeasure prototype vaccines" which satisfy the US military definition of a biological agent into people has killed some recipients and permanently disabled increasingly large numbers of others, "resulting in their (vaccines) operational effectiveness based on the measurable effects of their (vaccines) deployment", by the US military's own definitions of (vaccines) terms used in Operation Warp Speed contracts, the (vaccines) products it commissioned "amount to bioweapons".

The US military defines a biological agent as a micro-organism (or toxin derived from it) that causes disease.

Expand full comment

‘So many of you, those that are truly independent thinkers, if you allowed yourself to realize how truly moronic every doctor you’ve ever met is, you not only would never speak to them again, you would put a leash on them.

One that could be seen and held.

In contrast to the intellectual choke collars the medical schools put on each of them.

Expand full comment

Your doctor is now a representative of big Pharma and if they don't do as they are told and push those vaccines into you, they WILL be de-registered and unable to practice being a doctor ever again - read the news, it happens all of the time. Meryl Nass who posts regularly on her substack was one of those they tried to de-register. Be realistic when you see your doctor, his loyalty is first and foremost to Big Pharma and you come in last now.

Expand full comment