CDC inadvertently admits COVID jab negative effectiveness for hospitalisations

Negative effectiveness is a huge topic within a topic when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccines. If the effectiveness of the jabs turns out to be less than 0%, negative, there is no possibility that the benefits outweigh the risks, because there wouldn’t be any benefits - what is supposed to be a benefit is itself a risk. The jabs would obviously be harmful. Case closed. We keep seeing evidence of this phenomenon over time, with more evidence indicating negative effectiveness regarding infections and deaths in the past few weeks. Now we have more evidence for negative effectiveness regarding hospitalisations, and from the CDC, no less.

Slide 12 of a recent CDC presentation shows that for the most recent time period, January-May 2023, absolute vaccine effectiveness against COVID hospitalisation in immunocompetent adults is -8% for the monovalent doses; 29% for the bivalent booster dose, 7-89 days earlier; and -8% for the bivalent booster dose, 90-179 days earlier. Yet more evidence that, at this point in time, the vaccines are hardly helping, and are likely harming, before we even factor in the (other) adverse effects. And what happens beyond 179 days? Is it like many of the other studies we looked at in this ‘series’, where it looks like the jab just gets more and more negatively effective? And, once again, this evidence comes from the jab-loving CDC. Source.

Okay then.

Extra: And does this observational study account for the known statistical biases that can actually over-exaggerate the effectiveness of the vaccines, such as the case counting window bias? Seems unlikely; where is the data for 0-7 days earlier? And for those clinging desperately to the confidence intervals, or are somehow happy to see a figure like 29% effectiveness, because at least it is positive, though it is pathetically small and even turns negative within just a few months, should it even be this close to 0 (ineffective)? Given the known and unknown risks (including death via myocarditis), shouldn’t COVID vaccination be amazingly and obviously effective compared to doing nothing? Especially if you’re going to force it on people and demonise those who were clever enough - and possessed Djokovic levels of strength of will - to avoid the jabs?