7 Comments
User's avatar
Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

Yes, Roger, what unjabbed person would sign up for a new trial? I sure as hell am not interested in taking a 50% chance on a jab that could kill me, for no benefit. Not a single unjabbed person regrets their decision. We're relieved that we had the guts to stand strong.

Roger's avatar

What does it take to prove causation? A blinded, placebo-controlled prospective trial?

If so, that would be awfully hard to arrange at this stage.

But if a new mRNA technology were to be introduced, it might make sense for somebody besides the manufacturer to do a study to see what side effects a new mRNA technology causes.

Pete Wright's avatar

The old "correlation/causation" thing became pretty tedious during the "pandemic" (tm) didn't it?

Of course correlation can't prove causation what it does do is give people a bloody good place to start looking, (or in the case of authorities and Covid, the place to look away from).

Laura Noncomplier's avatar

They will never admit that their jabs are toxic and poisonous. To do so implicates many in democide.

Raphael Lataster (BPharm, PhD)'s avatar

They're admitting everything but this. We gotta keep pushing.

FS's avatar

It makes sense since even Original EUA study had increased mortality https://ibb.co/hyPcZyc https://ibb.co/31KJ6ss

Dan Flemmer's avatar

So, the critical mouth had no leg to stand on & had to use every available crutch, cane, and trapeze to fail to rebut much of anything? Geez, sounds lika buncha hot air to me. Sorta lika dog fart, not much volume but gawd, whatta stink! "D"