In late 2021 we reported on the curious situation that people in the less populous states of Australia, including Western Australia’s premier, were noticing an enormous rise in hospitalisations, despite them being relative untouched by COVID-19 and lockdowns (unlike those in more populous states like New South Wales and Victoria).
Why are the advisory groups (the Western Australia’s Vaccine Safety Advisory Committee (WAVSAC) and its subcommittee, a specialist sub-group, the Expert Clinical Review Group (ECRG) ) who are continuing to advise for further vaccination and boosting of people, including children, kept anonymous in this report? Careful reading of the report suggests that there are considerable signals for lack of safety and yet these committees apparently have been happy for the status quo to be continued, as if there are no safety signals at all.
Are these groups comprised of genuinely independent people or are they employees of associated - and potentially conflicted - companies? Do they work for organisations funded by pharmaceutical companies? Is their research supported by companies manufacturing the vaccines? Are declarations of any of their relevant Conflicts of Interest made public - as routinely happens with research publications in peer-reviewed journals? And if not, why not?
"How much more obvious does it need to get before we acknowledge the elephant in the room and start holding people accountable?"
I'm astounded just how big the elephant is getting without people mentioning it. I'm beginning to realize that the size of the elephant is no longer relevant. It is not until it starts to step on people that they will finally take notice. I'm not wishing harm on anyone, it's just that it seems that no matter how strong the correlations, no matter how scientific the data, no matter how frequent or urgent the alarms, there is an incredibly strong resistance to facing and accepting the truth of what is going on. Accountability, it appears, is the only thing more dreadful than the Covid virus itself.
I agree! I think the resistance to seeing the elephant is so strong because who wants to face that there's a sword hanging over their head??? Crazy truth is that those who stopped at 2 shots are not necessarily in the clear. There are so many issues including clots, strokes, and the heart damage. ADE, IG4, brain, and prions and on and on and on. Now amputations seem to be more and more common. Many vaccinated don't want to know. What's really awful to see here too is this implacable not-wanting-to-know I think makes a human being less-than-human. Our empathy for those suffering vax injury is nearly indiscernible as a society it seems. If an adverse event doesn't happen to me, or my child, or my spouse, my mom/dad/sister/brother/cousin/nephew/niece etc...then I deny it's an issue for someone else. And even more striking, if an adverse event DOES happen to me and family, it actually DIDN'T HAPPEN. It's something else that caused it. When the FDA and CDC issue statements against the FL Surgeon General with lying fluff of unscientific jargon and then approves a 4th shot for babies: I just don't know what. I'm about done reading about the injuries and deaths. I'm done with the loss of my career. But I am going to keep on reading, especially with clear substack articles like OTN, because I am occasionally called upon to provide something for someone who is kind of waking up.
Great comments LP and ME, it's hard for people to know when they don't want to know. And indeed, that's my aim with OTN, reaching out to normies using sources they have to accept.
Thanks for the update.
Why are the advisory groups (the Western Australia’s Vaccine Safety Advisory Committee (WAVSAC) and its subcommittee, a specialist sub-group, the Expert Clinical Review Group (ECRG) ) who are continuing to advise for further vaccination and boosting of people, including children, kept anonymous in this report? Careful reading of the report suggests that there are considerable signals for lack of safety and yet these committees apparently have been happy for the status quo to be continued, as if there are no safety signals at all.
Are these groups comprised of genuinely independent people or are they employees of associated - and potentially conflicted - companies? Do they work for organisations funded by pharmaceutical companies? Is their research supported by companies manufacturing the vaccines? Are declarations of any of their relevant Conflicts of Interest made public - as routinely happens with research publications in peer-reviewed journals? And if not, why not?
Well, they own the science, they own the regulators, they own everything. https://okaythennews.substack.com/p/politicians-and-media-and-experts https://okaythennews.substack.com/p/owners-of-everything-even-each-other
"How much more obvious does it need to get before we acknowledge the elephant in the room and start holding people accountable?"
I'm astounded just how big the elephant is getting without people mentioning it. I'm beginning to realize that the size of the elephant is no longer relevant. It is not until it starts to step on people that they will finally take notice. I'm not wishing harm on anyone, it's just that it seems that no matter how strong the correlations, no matter how scientific the data, no matter how frequent or urgent the alarms, there is an incredibly strong resistance to facing and accepting the truth of what is going on. Accountability, it appears, is the only thing more dreadful than the Covid virus itself.
I agree! I think the resistance to seeing the elephant is so strong because who wants to face that there's a sword hanging over their head??? Crazy truth is that those who stopped at 2 shots are not necessarily in the clear. There are so many issues including clots, strokes, and the heart damage. ADE, IG4, brain, and prions and on and on and on. Now amputations seem to be more and more common. Many vaccinated don't want to know. What's really awful to see here too is this implacable not-wanting-to-know I think makes a human being less-than-human. Our empathy for those suffering vax injury is nearly indiscernible as a society it seems. If an adverse event doesn't happen to me, or my child, or my spouse, my mom/dad/sister/brother/cousin/nephew/niece etc...then I deny it's an issue for someone else. And even more striking, if an adverse event DOES happen to me and family, it actually DIDN'T HAPPEN. It's something else that caused it. When the FDA and CDC issue statements against the FL Surgeon General with lying fluff of unscientific jargon and then approves a 4th shot for babies: I just don't know what. I'm about done reading about the injuries and deaths. I'm done with the loss of my career. But I am going to keep on reading, especially with clear substack articles like OTN, because I am occasionally called upon to provide something for someone who is kind of waking up.
Great comments LP and ME, it's hard for people to know when they don't want to know. And indeed, that's my aim with OTN, reaching out to normies using sources they have to accept.
It is clearly so.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
"wouldn't it be nice..." hums beach boys tune