Government data implicates COVID vaccines in surge of hospitalisations and deaths
Government data implicates COVID vaccines in surge of hospitalisations and deaths
In late 2021 we reported on the curious situation that people in the less populous states of Australia, including Western Australia’s premier, were noticing an enormous rise in hospitalisations, despite them being relative untouched by COVID-19 and lockdowns (unlike those in more populous states like New South Wales and Victoria). We at OTN thought it plausible that COVID-19 vaccines played at least some role as these states happened to have high vaccination rates. Now we have clear evidence.
Western Australia’s government has just released their vaccine safety surveillance report for 2021. Source. Right away we see a monstrous surge in adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs), just as the COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out:
And there seems to be a huge increase in AEFIs as a proportion, when the COVID jabs are compared with traditional vaccines:
In case we were hoping that these were just headaches and rashes, a bit of soreness and lethargy perhaps, 48% were treated in emergency departments with another 9% admitted to hospitals. And as many of us might expect by now, myocarditis and pericarditis were on the up just as the jabs came in:
There were numerous cases of immune thrombocytopenic purpura, an autoimmune disease, associated with the COVID vaccines. There were also many cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome and Bell’s palsy. One of the most common complaints involving COVID vaccines was chest pain. Also present were deep vein thrombosis, palpitations, pulmonary embolism, thrombocytopenia, and 87 deaths (with exactly 0 attributed to non-COVID vaccines). This is consistent with the Nature study indicating the jabs are behind the rise in many diseases. Despite this, the authorities want you to think that the COVID-19 vaccines have nothing to do with the mysterious cardiovascular-driven rise in excess deaths found all over the world, even when the unjabbed coincidentally appear to be doing better than the jabbed when it comes to both COVID and non-COVID deaths (click here and here).
Okay then.
Extra: Perhaps a little vindication for those unfairly labelled anti-vaxxers, for thinking these jabs might be a bit different from traditional vaccines? Also note that this is effectively what we predicted with our science summary, since it was unclear that the jabs were safe and effective from the beginning, from their own clinical trials. How much more obvious does it need to get before we acknowledge the elephant in the room and start holding people accountable? Oh, and perhaps we can stop discriminating against the unjabbed, especially those with autommimune and cardiovascular problems in their personal and family medical histories? That would be great.
Thanks for the update.
Why are the advisory groups (the Western Australia’s Vaccine Safety Advisory Committee (WAVSAC) and its subcommittee, a specialist sub-group, the Expert Clinical Review Group (ECRG) ) who are continuing to advise for further vaccination and boosting of people, including children, kept anonymous in this report? Careful reading of the report suggests that there are considerable signals for lack of safety and yet these committees apparently have been happy for the status quo to be continued, as if there are no safety signals at all.
Are these groups comprised of genuinely independent people or are they employees of associated - and potentially conflicted - companies? Do they work for organisations funded by pharmaceutical companies? Is their research supported by companies manufacturing the vaccines? Are declarations of any of their relevant Conflicts of Interest made public - as routinely happens with research publications in peer-reviewed journals? And if not, why not?
"How much more obvious does it need to get before we acknowledge the elephant in the room and start holding people accountable?"
I'm astounded just how big the elephant is getting without people mentioning it. I'm beginning to realize that the size of the elephant is no longer relevant. It is not until it starts to step on people that they will finally take notice. I'm not wishing harm on anyone, it's just that it seems that no matter how strong the correlations, no matter how scientific the data, no matter how frequent or urgent the alarms, there is an incredibly strong resistance to facing and accepting the truth of what is going on. Accountability, it appears, is the only thing more dreadful than the Covid virus itself.