Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Barry Kissane's avatar

Thanks for the update.

Why are the advisory groups (the Western Australia’s Vaccine Safety Advisory Committee (WAVSAC) and its subcommittee, a specialist sub-group, the Expert Clinical Review Group (ECRG) ) who are continuing to advise for further vaccination and boosting of people, including children, kept anonymous in this report? Careful reading of the report suggests that there are considerable signals for lack of safety and yet these committees apparently have been happy for the status quo to be continued, as if there are no safety signals at all.

Are these groups comprised of genuinely independent people or are they employees of associated - and potentially conflicted - companies? Do they work for organisations funded by pharmaceutical companies? Is their research supported by companies manufacturing the vaccines? Are declarations of any of their relevant Conflicts of Interest made public - as routinely happens with research publications in peer-reviewed journals? And if not, why not?

Expand full comment
learningprudence's avatar

"How much more obvious does it need to get before we acknowledge the elephant in the room and start holding people accountable?"

I'm astounded just how big the elephant is getting without people mentioning it. I'm beginning to realize that the size of the elephant is no longer relevant. It is not until it starts to step on people that they will finally take notice. I'm not wishing harm on anyone, it's just that it seems that no matter how strong the correlations, no matter how scientific the data, no matter how frequent or urgent the alarms, there is an incredibly strong resistance to facing and accepting the truth of what is going on. Accountability, it appears, is the only thing more dreadful than the Covid virus itself.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts