AS you point out, the government has little to lose. They fight off lawsuits using YOUR tax money, and if they lose, they pay off judgments using YOUR tax money.
Sadly with liberal governments having gone deep into debt there is not enough money coming from those governments to pay for all the covid injection damages. Get ready for the possibility of sovereign bankruptcies.
Hello, Doctor Lataster. I lost a friend in October to cancer. He had cancer of the anus, which I understand is fairly rare. I don't know if he died because he was inoculated (he was) or because he was unlucky or because of both. They radiated him and applied chemo-therapy, which made him feel pretty horrid for a few days afterwards. When he was passed to a hospice, he had a period of remission - he felt on top of the world. So, it was arranged that he would go home and restart his treatments.
I'm no doctor, Doctor, but the prognosis had been "death within three months", and, as it was, it was death in ten months, some of which was spent joyfully, in the bosom of family, and some of which was spent in administrative angst, being transported hither and thither, and some was spent ... living. Because the verdict had been terminal, I said to him he should ditch the chemo. it just made him feel rotten for days on end, only to have a few days of normality before the next session. But he was dutiful to his physicians, and followed their every injunction and recommendation to the letter.
On another tack, I know that sugar inhibits the production of insulin, and thus fosters obesity by not allowing the body to burn up energy. Some say sugar is a poison more nefarious that hard drugs.
So, with these two examples: how does one attempt to take a stance against received medical wisdom? And how can the lay be certain they're right to resist it?
It's very difficult, I left (former pharmacist). I'm also on board with a few other verboten things that have plenty of evidence going for them like like low sugar, low carb, etc.
I agree that suing the governments is just wealth transfer from the uninjured (both by the jab and by mistreatment for being unjabbed) to the injured. The payments must come from pharma an from the individuals in government who committed these crimes against humanity.
Yeh unlikely in Australia given the fact a simple phone call and time on hold with the hospitals reveals there intent to keep pushing the vaccine onto patients. And this is not to mention the new jab factory that’s recently been opened in Melbourne. The courts will cover for the government, who will cover for big pharma. To say I’m less than hopeful is an understatement.
Australia is full of lazy incompetents, which makes me pine for my ancestral homelands. However, we have several jab mandate wins and there is the refund of the lockdown fines. Even here we can get some justice.
What good is justice without repentance? There is zero regret by the medical industry who have stood to gain the most along with the people operating government authorities who have yet to acknowledge any wrong doing. Without transparency and accountability the type of justice necessary to address all of the wrongs, even if that be nothing more than a declaration of the wrong, change that prevents this ever happening again will not be found.
This is why we fight. Are you just going to stand there and take it? Or are you going to do what you can to try and ensure that what you want happens, even if you know there is only a 0.1% chance of success? I know which path I'm going with!
So those that didn't get jabbed paid for the jabs, and now we get to pay for the injuries. All those who shilled for the jabs, and those who happily got jabbed (and posted their virtue signalling on social media) should pay for their own injuries. We tried to tell them and were called cookers and right -wing conspiracy theorists. All those who were coerced into getting jabbed, I'm happy to pay.
Oh, and BTW, happy to be called "right-wing" now, as it clearly means someone who thinks little kids shouldn't be r*ped and abused, which those on the left seem to be quite OK with.
I hear you. This is why we need to go after the people that own our politicians. As for name-calling, it's all a badge of honour right now. Right-winger. Conspiracy theorist. Transphobe - which means you don't want to see males bash the shit out of females. Heck, even terms like sexist and racist are used for people who simply notice things.
BITCHES IS TOO KIND.
For destroying our lives over nothing? Yep.
WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING? they be us.
AS you point out, the government has little to lose. They fight off lawsuits using YOUR tax money, and if they lose, they pay off judgments using YOUR tax money.
And when it gets too hot, they simply resign! With a nice fat pension and cushy jobs awaiting them due to all the backscratching they've done!
Sadly with liberal governments having gone deep into debt there is not enough money coming from those governments to pay for all the covid injection damages. Get ready for the possibility of sovereign bankruptcies.
Hello, Doctor Lataster. I lost a friend in October to cancer. He had cancer of the anus, which I understand is fairly rare. I don't know if he died because he was inoculated (he was) or because he was unlucky or because of both. They radiated him and applied chemo-therapy, which made him feel pretty horrid for a few days afterwards. When he was passed to a hospice, he had a period of remission - he felt on top of the world. So, it was arranged that he would go home and restart his treatments.
I'm no doctor, Doctor, but the prognosis had been "death within three months", and, as it was, it was death in ten months, some of which was spent joyfully, in the bosom of family, and some of which was spent in administrative angst, being transported hither and thither, and some was spent ... living. Because the verdict had been terminal, I said to him he should ditch the chemo. it just made him feel rotten for days on end, only to have a few days of normality before the next session. But he was dutiful to his physicians, and followed their every injunction and recommendation to the letter.
On another tack, I know that sugar inhibits the production of insulin, and thus fosters obesity by not allowing the body to burn up energy. Some say sugar is a poison more nefarious that hard drugs.
So, with these two examples: how does one attempt to take a stance against received medical wisdom? And how can the lay be certain they're right to resist it?
It's very difficult, I left (former pharmacist). I'm also on board with a few other verboten things that have plenty of evidence going for them like like low sugar, low carb, etc.
I agree that suing the governments is just wealth transfer from the uninjured (both by the jab and by mistreatment for being unjabbed) to the injured. The payments must come from pharma an from the individuals in government who committed these crimes against humanity.
Yeh unlikely in Australia given the fact a simple phone call and time on hold with the hospitals reveals there intent to keep pushing the vaccine onto patients. And this is not to mention the new jab factory that’s recently been opened in Melbourne. The courts will cover for the government, who will cover for big pharma. To say I’m less than hopeful is an understatement.
Australia is full of lazy incompetents, which makes me pine for my ancestral homelands. However, we have several jab mandate wins and there is the refund of the lockdown fines. Even here we can get some justice.
What good is justice without repentance? There is zero regret by the medical industry who have stood to gain the most along with the people operating government authorities who have yet to acknowledge any wrong doing. Without transparency and accountability the type of justice necessary to address all of the wrongs, even if that be nothing more than a declaration of the wrong, change that prevents this ever happening again will not be found.
This is why we fight. Are you just going to stand there and take it? Or are you going to do what you can to try and ensure that what you want happens, even if you know there is only a 0.1% chance of success? I know which path I'm going with!
I have been one of those who’ve been fighting bro. All of my submissions I’ve made public.
It's called self extermination....YES YOUR PAYING FOR YOUR OWN LIQUIDATION.... YOUR BEING LIQUIDATED.....
So those that didn't get jabbed paid for the jabs, and now we get to pay for the injuries. All those who shilled for the jabs, and those who happily got jabbed (and posted their virtue signalling on social media) should pay for their own injuries. We tried to tell them and were called cookers and right -wing conspiracy theorists. All those who were coerced into getting jabbed, I'm happy to pay.
Oh, and BTW, happy to be called "right-wing" now, as it clearly means someone who thinks little kids shouldn't be r*ped and abused, which those on the left seem to be quite OK with.
I hear you. This is why we need to go after the people that own our politicians. As for name-calling, it's all a badge of honour right now. Right-winger. Conspiracy theorist. Transphobe - which means you don't want to see males bash the shit out of females. Heck, even terms like sexist and racist are used for people who simply notice things.