Natural immunity conspiracy theory now obvious fact
Natural immunity conspiracy theory now obvious fact
As evidence continues to pour in, the COVID-19 skeptics continue to be proven right. NBC News has reported on a new study published in the Lancet, commenting: “The immunity generated from an infection was found to be “at least as high, if not higher” than that provided by two doses of an mRNA vaccine.” They also acknowledged that “the immunity acquired from infection did appear to wane more slowly than the immunity from two doses of an mRNA vaccine”. Source. CNN also reported on the study. Source.
In October 2021 the very same NBC News reported, parroting the CDC, that the jabs “provide stronger immunity than past infection”. Source. Also in 2021 CNN reported that the US Surgeon General declared that natural immunity is “not nearly as strong” as the jab, also associating the now-proven phenomenon with anti-vaxxers. Source.
Okay then.
Extra: Numerous experts will no doubt claim that it’s safer to get the jab than to get natural immunity by being infected with COVID-19. But is that relevant when the jab clearly doesn’t stop the spread, and with “most of the unvaccinated” having already had the virus by now, as admitted by Dr Leana Wen, who also acknowledged that studies are revealing natural immunity to be far superior to the jab? And is it relevant for those who acquired natural immunity before having had a chance to take the jab? And is this true, given the increasing evidence not only for the jabs’ cardiovascular and other adverse effects, but the jabs’ negative effectiveness? And as with the myocarditis issue, would you rather the risk from COVID alone, or the risk from COVID plus the risks from the jab? Shall we overlook the obvious fact that the jab confers additional risks that prior natural immunity obviously can not? Shall we also overlook the evidence that taking the jab after acquiring natural immunity is associated with an even higher risk of adverse effects? And shall we also overlook the evidence indicating that the jab undoes most of the benefits of natural immunity? And should ‘hybrid immunity’ (natural immunity plus the jab) be encouraged when the typical vaccine mandate requires only the jab? Somehow those with only natural immunity are discriminated against despite superior protection. Finally, readers may get a chuckle from knowing that the Lancet study in question was funded by Bill Gates. Source. The same Bill Gates who likely profits off of the highly lucrative jabs.