We have been covering the issue of apparent COVID-19 vaccine negative effectiveness quite a bit, because, well, how can the vaccines be ‘safe & effective’ if they increase your chance of COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation, and even death?
When all this crap re masks & distancing & "protect the elderly/vulnerable" first started up I pulled on my researchers coat & poked about the net for other stuff on viral transmission. I already knew that British consultants had been banned from wearing long hair to work & told to tuck their ties into their shirts on the wards because their hair & their ties was transferring viruses around hospitals & subjecting those without effective immune systems to everyday cold viruses that could kill them!
And that's the crux of this post. A cancer sufferer, organ recipient or anyone else with challenged immunity could easily be killed by even the mildest cold-like virus. The fact that some elderly/vulnerable were catching SARS-II & dying was not evidence that SARS-II was deadly dangerous. It simply proved what we already knew. Even a bug with so little effects that you'd go to work & carry on despite the mild symptoms, could kill an elderly/vulnerable person.
If theirs effective under any circumstances is ever negative, shouldn't they be facilitating outbreaks then? Given enough people are vaccinated in a short time and experience ade...
Hope you are well Raphael.
When all this crap re masks & distancing & "protect the elderly/vulnerable" first started up I pulled on my researchers coat & poked about the net for other stuff on viral transmission. I already knew that British consultants had been banned from wearing long hair to work & told to tuck their ties into their shirts on the wards because their hair & their ties was transferring viruses around hospitals & subjecting those without effective immune systems to everyday cold viruses that could kill them!
And that's the crux of this post. A cancer sufferer, organ recipient or anyone else with challenged immunity could easily be killed by even the mildest cold-like virus. The fact that some elderly/vulnerable were catching SARS-II & dying was not evidence that SARS-II was deadly dangerous. It simply proved what we already knew. Even a bug with so little effects that you'd go to work & carry on despite the mild symptoms, could kill an elderly/vulnerable person.
If theirs effective under any circumstances is ever negative, shouldn't they be facilitating outbreaks then? Given enough people are vaccinated in a short time and experience ade...
https://vigilance.pervaers.com/p/us-summer-deaths-of-2021
Looks like they are!