New UK data continues to show jabbed overrepresented in COVID & non-COVID deaths

You may recall from earlier this year our two reports on the UK’s unjabbed apparently outperforming the jabbed when it comes to COVID-19 deaths and all-cause deaths, seemingly further evidence of negative effectiveness. It’s time for another update, with data now available through to mid-2023. Source.

On Table 1, focussing on the last month available, May 2023, we see 45 COVID deaths in the unjabbed (4.76%). There were 901 COVID deaths in the jabbed (95.24%). Recall that we earlier estimated, utilising UK government data, the equivalent population’s unjabbed share at 10%. It again appears that the unjabbed are doing about twice as well as you’d expect (if the jabs had zero effect - they’re supposed to be life-saving), a clear indicator of the jab’s negative efficacy, even for deaths and this is even worse for the jabbed than in our last entry in this mini-series. Continuing on, we find 1,120 non-COVID deaths in the unjabbed (3.27%). There were 33,079 non-COVID deaths in the jabbed (96.73%). Once again, in line with our previous reports, the unjabbed are doing brilliantly. With roughly 10% of the population (perhaps more?) contributing to only 3% of non-COVID deaths and 5% of COVID deaths, it does look like further confirmation that the jabs are not safe and effective; but unsafe and negatively effective. Again, instead of risks vs benefits, we should be talking about risks plus risks.

Okay then.

Extra: Why are the jabbed dying at a much higher rate than expected? And why is this still happening? Note that we are not just talking about total deaths, because you surely have by now heard the constant retort: ‘There are more jabbed so of course more jabbed are dying, you bigot, stop committing the base rate fallacy!’ No, we are talking about proportions of deaths here, no base rate fallacy involved. I wonder what the jabbed did differently to the unjabbed. Let me know if you can figure it out!

Extra: Commenters here encouraged me to dig a little deeper. I’m hesitant to start playing complex number games, especially when so many figures have been manipulated to favour the mainstream narratives, however, it turned out to be worth it. A lot of people seemed concerned with age breakdown and age-standardised mortality, which can be so easily manipulated (such as by being affected by the ‘with COVID or from COVID’ issue), so try this, looking at numbers for all-cause deaths, which is harder to fudge. Look at Table 2, all cause deaths, May 2023. The unjabbed outperformed variously dosed jabbed groups, in terms of age-standardised mortality, for most age groups. This is weird, huh, for a life-saving jab that everyone should apparently be taking? Looks like we have some mixture of negative effectiveness and significant numbers of other adverse effects. Looks to me like the jab isn’t worth it, for any age group, but especially the relatively young and healthy, who clearly have the least to gain and the most to lose. And we still don’t know the long-term implications.