Pfizer, FDA, and now CDC admits to COVID vaccine negative effectiveness?

Well this is a doozy, and just days after our last entry on COVID-19 vaccine negative effectiveness (the vaccine increases the chance of infection, and in some cases also hospitalisation and death). We reported late last year that the FDA, referring to Pfizer’s own analysis, was aware that there appeared to be some level of negative effectiveness. Now the CDC, reporting on the new variant, BA.2.whoevencaresanymore (sorry, BA.2.86), states: “BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines.” This appears to be a half-admission that those who have not had COVID and have not had the COVID jab are less, yes you heard me, less likely to get this new form of COVID than those who are jabbed. Source.

Okay then.

But wait, there’s more. There would also appear to be a bit of tricky deception going on here. The phrase “people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines” would lead to many interpreting this as implying some sort of equivalence between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated who have natural immunity granted via prior infection. But we know, despite all the misinformation, that natural immunity is superior to the vaccine. And one fact should make it obvious why: while the jabs prompt the body to recognise the spike protein, natural immunity involves recognition of the whole virus. So, for example, if there were mutations on the spike protein that led to immune escape it would be expected that the jabs would become pretty useless (if they ever weren’t), even less than useless (negative effectiveness) as the body wastes its efforts and resources to fight an enemy that isn’t at the door, while natural immunity still has an important role to play. Care to guess which part of the newly mutated variant has had mutations leading to immune escape? Thankfully, there is no need to guess! The prestigious Nature journal understands that the new variant “carries numerous changes to its spike protein”. Source.

Okay then.