Offspring of COVID-vaccinated rats display autism-like behaviours
Just days after we reported on an article providing some evidence for the ‘unthinkable’ notion that the genetic COVID-19 vaccines alter our DNA, we are made aware of another study (Erdogan et al.), published by major academic publisher Springer, looking into prenatal exposure to the Pfizer jab in rats. The researchers state: “Pregnant rats received the COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine during gestation. Subsequent evaluations on male and female offspring included autism-like behaviors, neuronal counts, and motor performance. Molecular techniques were applied to quantify WNT and m-TOR gene expressions, BDNF levels, and specific cytokines in brain tissue samples. The findings were then contextualized within the extant literature to identify potential mechanisms. Our findings reveal that the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine significantly alters WNT gene expression and BDNF levels in both male and female rats, suggesting a profound impact on key neurodevelopmental pathways. Notably, male rats exhibited pronounced autism-like behaviors, characterized by a marked reduction in social interaction and repetitive patterns of behavior. Furthermore, there was a substantial decrease in neuronal counts in critical brain regions, indicating potential neurodegeneration or altered neurodevelopment. Male rats also demonstrated impaired motor performance, evidenced by reduced coordination and agility. Our research provides insights into the effects of the COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine on WNT gene expression, BDNF levels, and certain neurodevelopmental markers in a rat model. More extensive studies are needed to confirm these observations in humans and to explore the exact mechanisms. A comprehensive understanding of the risks and rewards of COVID-19 vaccination, especially during pregnancy, remains essential.” Source.
Okay then.
Extra: No comment is made here on the possibility of vaccines in general causing autism; it is the COVID-19 vaccines I am concerned with, and I am no anti-vaxxer. As for the COVID jabs, this little revelation could be everything and it could be nothing. The results seem scary. But the study is in rats, not humans. Though we do studies in rats for a reason. The rats also received very high doses of vaccine. Though that is partly done due to metabolic differences. And does this only apply to already pregnant rats, or will we find this in vaccinated rats who later become pregnant and produce offspring as well? As always, more research is needed. But then, doesn’t that support the cautious agnosticism I endorsed from the beginning? If more research is always needed whenever we see some concerning evidence, should we be holding off on rapidly declaring something highly novel and experimental as being “safe and effective”, let alone forcing people to take it?
Extra: Surely more fodder for the hard-core conspiracy theorists, to go along with conspiracy theories around the jabs causing deaths, infertility, and altered DNA. We will surely now be hearing conspiracy theories about the jabs leading to a more dependant and compliant populace. Especially when the people that own everything enjoy hanging out at World Economic Forum meetings. Source. The same World Economic Forum that is interested in Yuval Harari’s thoughts on how humans can be hacked, how our feelings and decisions can be predicted and manipulated, and how the “power to hack humans can be used for good purposes”. Source. Well as long as the greedy billionaires have our best interests at heart, the same ones who are building bunkers to hold off the hordes of regular folk who for some reason are expected to eventually be a bit unhappy with them…