Young Americans, Brits, Aussies, and others have cause for alarm as cancer in the young is absolutely skyrocketing, and experts wonder if “synthetic chemicals that our biology isn’t familiar with” could be playing a role.
The 4-Corners ABC program kept talking about a sharp increase in the past 20-25 years, without showing any graphs to support that timeline. Its presenter was Dr Norman Swan, the same journalist who relentlessly brainwashed ABC audience throughout the Plandemic. According to him, a change in food habits is the most likely cause... OK then.
Dr Norman Swan does not participate in rational objective debate on any medical issue for fear of instant dismissal that will be activated by the power of the pharmaceutical industrial complex lobby to ABC management. The narrative is set by captured political determinants so as a result of this "censored" situation the "bleedin' obvious" will never be approached. Lesson? Don't rely on ABC TV programs if you want the truth to be investigated. Don't believe me? - just ask Maryanne Demasi.
Nobody in authority anywhere wants to green-light research on the jibby-jabs because those same authorities assured everyone they were Safe & Effective and had been rigorously tested. They then mandated them for the general public. The general public don't want to even think about what those jabs have done to them. Not as if anyone can remove what they jabbed into themselves is it? So they'd rather not know.
I went to the link for the ABC news Austrailia you tube video to leave a comment that its the vaccine, but THEY TURNED OFF COMMENTS! Imagine that. I wonder why
"Since the experts apparently don’t know what has caused this..." They know. And many of them are in pain at facing job loss or professional opprobrium as a cost for reporting it. Some have already, but they are censored.
If one believes in Hannah Arendt's concept of the "banality of evil" it would suggest that most evil is through rationalization and compartmentalization of responsibility - in short avoidance and narrowing one's vision. I believe only a small percentage of the population is evil in the sociopathic sense - enjoying hurting or bringing suffering to others, or at least being so lacking in empathy as to be indifferent to the pain of others. However, if you include the banal institutionalized evil, you are likely to be correct - there are indeed many who simply are highly trained or skilled, depending on how you want to assign the locus of responsibility, in the art of rationalizing their own evil behavior. This kind of evil is undoubtedly is on the rise in synchrony with a decline in religion and spiritual values culturally. In Nuremberg, they found that this kind of evil was still one which a person could be held culpable for. I agree. Denial is a powerful force, but there is still some awareness of an evil that is being denied.
Most victims were so psychotic about forming part of the mass, that they cannot now countenance the reality that they did in fact take one for the team.
I guess something is stealing electrons at an unprecedented rate, (Dr Jerry Tennant books, Healing is Voltage, The Handbook and Cancer’s On/Off Switch: Polarity).
The 4-Corners ABC program kept talking about a sharp increase in the past 20-25 years, without showing any graphs to support that timeline. Its presenter was Dr Norman Swan, the same journalist who relentlessly brainwashed ABC audience throughout the Plandemic. According to him, a change in food habits is the most likely cause... OK then.
Dr Norman Swan does not participate in rational objective debate on any medical issue for fear of instant dismissal that will be activated by the power of the pharmaceutical industrial complex lobby to ABC management. The narrative is set by captured political determinants so as a result of this "censored" situation the "bleedin' obvious" will never be approached. Lesson? Don't rely on ABC TV programs if you want the truth to be investigated. Don't believe me? - just ask Maryanne Demasi.
I've heard people are declining invitations to lunch on beef wellington with mushrooms. Could that be the cause?
They can't ignore it any more, so now they try to normalise and explain it away. Evil. Confusion, deception, lies. Accomplices.
Typical ploy of uncooperative politicians: deny, ignore, obfuscate - hopefully everyone will eventually lose interest and the problem will go away!
It's up to us to not lose interest and to hold them accountable.
Do we really expect the powers-that-be to investigate their own democide?
Nobody in authority anywhere wants to green-light research on the jibby-jabs because those same authorities assured everyone they were Safe & Effective and had been rigorously tested. They then mandated them for the general public. The general public don't want to even think about what those jabs have done to them. Not as if anyone can remove what they jabbed into themselves is it? So they'd rather not know.
Re: Your prescient question posed exactly TWO YEARS AGO as the title of your linked article:
"Does BMJ accept COVID-19 vaccine benefits do not now outweigh the (myocarditis) risks?"
At this point, there appear to be nothing but the most hypothetical and specious of COVID-19 injection "benefits" on the scale.
Given the squandered reputation of the BMJ, it no longer matters what it accepts, except to those desperate to turn a blind eye to reality.
I went to the link for the ABC news Austrailia you tube video to leave a comment that its the vaccine, but THEY TURNED OFF COMMENTS! Imagine that. I wonder why
"Since the experts apparently don’t know what has caused this..." They know. And many of them are in pain at facing job loss or professional opprobrium as a cost for reporting it. Some have already, but they are censored.
Depends on whether you're willing to believe that the experts and authorities are stupid or evil. Denying the latter gets harder by the day.
If one believes in Hannah Arendt's concept of the "banality of evil" it would suggest that most evil is through rationalization and compartmentalization of responsibility - in short avoidance and narrowing one's vision. I believe only a small percentage of the population is evil in the sociopathic sense - enjoying hurting or bringing suffering to others, or at least being so lacking in empathy as to be indifferent to the pain of others. However, if you include the banal institutionalized evil, you are likely to be correct - there are indeed many who simply are highly trained or skilled, depending on how you want to assign the locus of responsibility, in the art of rationalizing their own evil behavior. This kind of evil is undoubtedly is on the rise in synchrony with a decline in religion and spiritual values culturally. In Nuremberg, they found that this kind of evil was still one which a person could be held culpable for. I agree. Denial is a powerful force, but there is still some awareness of an evil that is being denied.
At this point, it seems like evil is more likely.
We may have come closer to the truth if Professor Angus Dalgleish was the presenter. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YB8r4INONsU
It's not mysterious. I'll bet each & every one of them had to be vaccinated to work.
Most victims were so psychotic about forming part of the mass, that they cannot now countenance the reality that they did in fact take one for the team.
I guess something is stealing electrons at an unprecedented rate, (Dr Jerry Tennant books, Healing is Voltage, The Handbook and Cancer’s On/Off Switch: Polarity).
Thanks, your post gave me the idea for this meme:
https://patrick.net/post/1340336/2021-07-29-thread-for-vax-deaths-maimings-and?start=8834#comment-2189528
If people have no idea what is added to foods, how can we trust anyone. It's easy to throw red herrings to lead us down the wrong path.