Skit: COVID-19 vaccine side effect reports remain unverified

So much about COVID-19 would be funny if it wasn’t so tragic. Here’s a little skit, prepared ages ago, but published now as a dodgy Christmas present for our dozens of readers! It’s about how official COVID-19 vaccine side effect reports cannot be used to question the safety of the jabs as they remain perpetually unverified. Here’s some info and links on all the issues alluded to in this 59 second (!) video:

• On vaccine side effects reports being unverified by the relevant government agencies, and how this allows the regulators to declare the vaccines to be safe no matter how many side effects are reported, with the best excuse being that there are simply too many reports to deal with, click here and here. While you’re here, an update on my interactions with the Australian TGA on this issue. They assure us that ‘almost all’ of the more than 139,000 adverse event reports are classified as ‘possible’. When I pressed further on why they aren’t verifying these reports, and who should be if not them, I was told I would be responded to within 20 working days. That was months ago. Apparently it’s just standard practice now to ignore all the evidence we don’t like. Science, bitches!

• Dr Expert’s entry is a bit of a ‘jab’ at social media companies butting in on basically every post about COVID-19 to add ‘context’, and that also applies to this very video. They even ban whole posts, censoring the science they tell us to trust, like when I shared an article from an actual medical journal.

• We’re constantly told by the authorities that the jabs are “safe and effective” when we still, by definition don’t have access to long-term safety data. Not to mention that there were all sorts of issues with Pfizer’s trial. Heck, Pfizer even says that they are still trying to “determine if COMIRNATY is safe and effective, and if there is a myocarditis/pericarditis association that should be noted”.

• For the clinical trials being short and unimpressive (no mortality benefit, even an observed mortality deficit), see the first part of our popular ‘science summary’.

• On the CDC quietly updating their website when they were clearly proven wrong about things like the jab and its products staying at the injection site, only hanging around the body for a few days, and the like, click here, here, and here.

• On COVID skeptics being the ‘silly’ ones for simply asking reasonable questions, something all rational people should be doing, just think of all the times ‘conspiracy theories’ about COVID turned out to be, well, not. Apart from the examples above, there is the case of the lab leak ‘conspiracy theory’ now being a legitimate hypothesis; the fact that natural immunity was linked to conspiratorial thinking when it is now proven by science to be superior to the jab, as would be expected; and for some non-COVID examples, Woody Harrelson was effectively branded a conspiracy theorist for joking about Big Pharma and the mainstream media having the same owners, something that is easily verified with publicly available investment records (yes, the same few people pretty much own everything); President Trump was accused of spreading conspiracy theories when he claimed that he was spied on, and all the while he actually was spied on; and of course, let’s not forget about Russiagate, a case where you were the conspiracy theorist for not believing the unfounded conspiracy theory, and where the authorities and experts straight up lied.

Okay then.